Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
But the federal law already includes a method for resolving competing slates of electors. Why would a court block that process from happening, essentially usurping the role of Congress?

-PJ

50 posted on 11/18/2020 3:04:14 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too
But the federal law already includes a method for resolving competing slates of electors. Why would a court block that process from happening, essentially usurping the role of Congress?

Because there is already a slate of electors chosen, by the voters, according to law. The legislature would be acting contrary to the law by appointing a second slate. It's one thing if a court says that's the option they should follow. It's another thing for them to do it just because the decided to. No court is going to allow that. It opens up a scenario where any legislature in any state could override the election just because they don't like the results.

51 posted on 11/18/2020 3:12:01 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson