No, I don’t ask her to try her case in the press. I ask her to inform us of what facts she will be able to introduce into evidence, e.g. we have found specific computer code that flips votes, we have a numerous signatures that do not match, we have emails or text messages directing election officials to do things . . . I don’t expect her to tell us what the code says or show the signatures, but thus far all we have heard is crap like “ I’m going to release the kraken!” Either release it or be quiet.
Although I am 100% confident this election was the result of fraud and impropriety, in an election challenge, votes have to be shown improper one vote at a time. It is a very painstaking process. I cannot imagine they can do that in enough cases to flip the election.
votes have to be shown improper one vote at a time
You're arguing retail and I think Powell and team are thinking wholesale. If it is shown that there is a algorithm in the counting software that switches votes or creates votes, are you suggesting that those phantom vote totals cannot be adjusted in mass?
Besides, overturning the vote totals might not be the goal. If the results can be shown to be unreliable and not to be relied on, the selection of electors could fall to the state legislatures where Republicans hold the advantage in PA, MI, WI, and GA. The goal might be to get the USSC to rule that seriously contaminated vote totals cannot be used by the legislatures to select electors.