Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: con-surf-ative

...very few evidentiary facts.


That’s for the courtroom.


18 posted on 11/17/2020 8:58:39 AM PST by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

Why would Sidney Powell risk her reputation by making allegations she could not back up? Her efforts in uncovering the FBI got job on Gen. Flynn were the result of dogged research, persistence and brilliant legal analysis. She is not a PR hack, she is a high profile and very successful lawyer with a resume that includes years of success before appellate courts, including the SCOTUS. She has something concrete or she wouldn’t be taking the case and wouldn’t be sticking her neck out.


28 posted on 11/17/2020 9:04:47 AM PST by littleharbour ("You take on the intel community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you" C. Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

Right. Evidence is for the courtroom. All this screaming for evidence is ridiculous. You don’t publicize evidence before you go to court because it gives the other side a heads up to counter it! Lin Wood is accusing the Gov of Georgia of corruption but says as a defamation lawyer he would not say that if he couldn’t prove it in court.


62 posted on 11/17/2020 10:04:32 AM PST by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson