I like that you’re posting the Lame Cherry stuff, but I would caution that a grain of salt is necessary when reading her stuff. It’s sometimes rather speculative. I still like reading it though, as I have a lot of grains of salt.
I like that youâre posting the Lame Cherry stuff, but I would caution that a grain of salt is necessary when reading her stuff. Itâs sometimes rather speculative. I still like reading it though, as I have a lot of grains of salt.
***********************************
Much of what we read here is speculative and we are
cautioned to think and decide for ourselves.
>> I still like reading it though, as I have a lot of grains of salt.
I’d more say grains of something I can’t recognize, but which are large enough that I don’t want to step on barefoot, so want to keep an eye on them.
I’m a pretty conservative type, so I sometimes read LC with my jaw dropping down. But how I react depends on the topic. On some, I’ll find myself nodding my head and intrigued. On others, I’m horrified and running away from the conspiracy hills to the safety of Flatland.
The one posted did intrigue me, but I remind myself to always verify and not ingest. One can play personal gossip games in the head that start with a small piece of decent information and, before you recognize it, you’re believing something wholly silly.
But I WILL keep my eye on those grains when I don’t have the slippers of Steve W.’s caution to guide me around them.
Number One lesson I learned in my test engineering years.....
There is no such thing as Too Much Data.