“No, but I haven’t seen anything very impressive from the people who should be doing that.”
What would impress you, and where do you think you would see it? Do you find the filed complaints to be defective or deficient?
I guess we will see. If these cases are lost, it won’t be due to a lack of specialty election lawyers.
I'd like to see some filings that allege fraud or at least something beyond what are run-of-the mill human errors or partisan complaining about insufficient access. You know, something that would give a judge pause.
In the hearings I know about the Trump camp lawyers have been very clear that they aren't alleging fraud or wrongdoing, just raising concerns about process, and haven't come close to documenting problems that would sway enough votes to be meaningful.
At this very minute they're in court (conference call) in AZ on the ridiculous Sharpie-gate thing trying to admit a bunch of affidavits they collected from an online form on their web site.
The admit that some of the ones they got were false but say they excluded all the ones they knew were bad.
The judge rightly asked how they verified the reliability of the remaining affidavits. They replied; CAPTCHA.
Needless to say, the judge excluded the affidavits.
I'm not saying something compelling won't appear but they're sure taking their time presenting it. And in the meantime all we're hearing on TV is a bunch of allegations that they seem afraid to actually put in front of a court.