This Youtube link “The Jordan Report” has Gohmert talking and links the Spectator article...
Did the U.S. Raid Software Co. In Germany & Seize Server!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoiElCIZ7v4
Gohmert’s seems it is the same Newsmax / Chris Salcedo vid as posted before.
The Spectator article, read aloud and separately linked, says they have an independent source verifying the story.
That source says the CIA was kept out of it...
If this were the MSM... that’d be more than good enough ?
Most useful bit in the Youtube link may be in the comments:
“Noteworthy... The current Director of National Intelligence appointed by Trump is Richard Grenell. He is formerly the US Ambassador to Germany. He would be in a position to negotiate effectively and directly with former counterparts. And, search YouTube for his recent comments, multiple calling for the accountability of US intelligence agencies (read CIA).”
My musing:
The judge in Arizona refusing to “seal” the evidence might well preclude the government providing evidence they do have, but cannot allow to be made public... yet.
Brennan’s extreme TDS episode in the wake of Esper’s firing... tied to risk Trump might declassify everything...
I’ve previously noted my skepticism of the DOJ, particularly in relation to election fraud... which they’ve bent over backwards to ignore for decades.
That effort is made apparent, again, in this NBC news bit citing a letter published by the WaPoo...
There is no evidence of voter fraud or other irregularities that could substantially impact the election, 16 federal prosecutors charged with investigating election crimes have said in a letter to Attorney General William Barr.
The assistant U.S. attorneys who are District Election Officers also urged Barr to rescind a controversial memo issued Monday that authorized prosecutors “to pursue substantial allegations of voting and vote tabulation irregularities prior to the certification of elections.” That is a change from a Justice Department policy.
They wrote that the policy change “was not based in fact”; that in their jurisdictions there is no evidence of substantial allegations; and that their understanding is that a Justice Department section in charge of national oversight of election fraud hasn’t seen any such evidence, either.
“The timing of the announcement inserts all of us into a partisan political debate,” the assistant U.S. attorneys wrote. They said the policy change “has and will engender speculation that it was motivated by partisan political concerns.” The head of the Justice Department’s Election Crimes Branch has resigned that position to protest the Barr memo.
The letter from the assistant U.S. attorneys was reported earlier Friday by The Washington Post.
The obvious, again... How do you know there’s NO EVIDENCE... when you haven’t looked for any ? Why would you think having 16 people not looking would better validate a result in not finding anything ? And they advocate for... looking less ???
All I see is 16 Asst US Attorneys that need to be fired... since they INTEND to not find crimes that exist... instead of intending to ensure that crime doesn’t pay.