Bannon: “Arizona Senate Judiciary Committee to hold a virtual hearing tomorrow... WITH SUBPOENA POWER... to hear testimony and view evidence.”
Now that the state officials have all signed off on the fraudulently created vote totals, under penalty of perjury, by certifying them as legitimate... State legislatures in those states will be looking at the issues, for the first time, in a way that matters. None of the prior hearings have used subpoena power, or held witnesses or officials under oath while testifying. Many officials have refused to attend those events, even after having said they would, in spite of not being sworn in. Turning the heat up a notch now... probably explains why Youtube is saying they’ll ban talk of fraud ? But, late today, backed off to say they would implement it after January 20th ? LOL!!! Wanna bet they change their mind when Trump wins ?
So, the point... the first “real” investigations of fraud... begin starting tomorrow. The noise thus far has only been about sussing it out... not proving it.
Note that the only real impact of the “safe harbor” deadline... was in encouraging the state officials to sign off on certifying the frauds as “not fraud” by a date certain. Now that the date has come and gone... no one cares... it clearly has had no other impact ?
However, as the real fraud investigations begin... the public is already aware enough that we’re seeing media attempts to ban OTHERS talking about it ? Good job to all those who’ve kept the pressure on... and made people take note... not allowing it to go away. Vindication soon ?
If you’ve been following the lawsuits... as the state judges have worked to oppose them and downplay their significance, you will already be aware that they’ve developed significant and compelling evidence of fraud. The efforts made have allowed them to refine their presentation of that collected information, even as it continues to snowball over time, adding more mass as the ball rolls downhill and accelerates. Some elements of that evidence we know exists, developed through the public process seeking it, are incontrovertible in showing that potential existed to enable fraud. A few instances exist showing that potential being acted upon... and there is a mass of forensic information connecting “potential” to “what had to have happened” to a very high probability. Left to be revealed: smoking guns showing that was in fact the plan... and the plan was executed.
Odds are you’d never get that... without a grant of power to engage in discovery ? A court can give that... including the Supreme Court under its original jurisdiction. Or, a legislature can grant itself that power ? The key is knowing where to look, and what to look for, before you start looking. So, it appears that’s known, now, and discovery is coming... unless, there’s already a parallel grant enabling fulfillment with a simple request ?
Perhaps... EO13848 has resulted in evidence in hand ? Perhaps the server in Germany... will turn out to be a real story, and not fiction ? Are they the same thing ?
A quick search (”Germany”)on FR shows... as the number of rough “close to source” articles grew and then died down after November 8th, the story continued to expanded, and then crept into analysis in more “mainstream” sources:
11/29, American Thinker:
New reports about election manipulation read like a Tom Clancy novel
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3910443/posts
12/03, The Spectator:
So, What’s Going On with the Server Reportedly Obtained in a Raid in Germany Related to the 2020 Election?
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3912072/posts
We already knew there was a big surge of traffic out of Germany on election night... which the Germans reported as it broke records. Now we also have a map showing that traffic flowing between Germany and hubs in the U.S., with no other explanation for a big surge between Germany and the U.S. other than the election. And, it is said, there is more than a map of the traffic... but that we have both the “hardware” and the “packets”... meaning the actual data, not just a map of the route it took in flowing from the US to Germany.
I doubt this gets resolved... until it is delivered as testimony (or not) in a hearing with subpoena power, whether that happens in Arizona, at the SCOTUS, or before the Congress when they do their investigations of contested electors.