Posted on 11/08/2020 8:04:58 PM PST by Sense
In this youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&feature=youtu.be
Host L Todd Wood reveals the mechanics behind the electronic vote steal operation in an interview with powerful source.
Sidney Wants to Hear From You
Contact Sidney Powell… https://www.sidneypowell.com/contact
403 Forbidden… https://daisy-pentagon-lsj5.squarespace.com/
Daisy = DLA Disposition Services Automated Information System (DAISY)
https://www.dla.mil/Portals/104/Documents/InformationOperations/PrivacyImpact%20Assessments/DAISYNationalSalesProgramDNSPWebVersion.pdf
LSJ = limited source justification
J&A … part_8_afmcfars_ja_limited_sources_31may07.pdf
= justification & authorization (class)
https://www.esi.mil/Download.aspx?id=7307
LSJ for Qadium… Redacted Qadium LSJ.PDF
https://www.esi.mil/Download.aspx?id=7304
class limited sources justification - DoD ESI
Qadium origin… https://medium.com/binaryloom/qadium-is-offering-a-million-dollar-solution-for-iot-security-f042d86d8c30
Qadium SBIR… https://www.sbir.gov/sbc/qadium-inc-0
Qadium expands… https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/us-department-of-defense-awards-37-million-contract-to-cybersecurity-startup-qadium-300686469.html
Disrupt 100… what do you see? http://www.disrupt100.com/?company=qadium
Qadium drops the Q… https://expanse.co/press/qadium-is-now-expanse/
Expanse on Crunchbase… https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/expanse-inc
Expanse Expands… Expanse, which lets its customers know when their digital assets aren’t safe, has raised $70 million in new funding
https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/09/expanse-which-offers-real-time-visibility-into-the-ways-its-customers-digital-assets-arent-safe-has-raised-70-million-in-new-funding/
Expanse Ordering Open to All DoD… https://www.esi.mil/contentview.aspx?id=953
What does Expanse do ? https://www.carahsoft.com/expanse
The Expanse is acquired… https://expanse.co/
Palo Alto Networks... https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/company/press/2020/palo-alto-networks-announces-intent-to-acquire-expanse
Maybe Sidney wants to hear from me...
But, it seems someone doesn’t want to let her hear from me ?
Twitter the new arbiter of what’s worth seeing ?
If they ban it, you probably have to see it...
Twitter Censors Lin Wood
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3908711/posts
But, here’s a shorter link than the one in the FR link, to help keep your interface with Google down to the minimum.
Michael Flynn Jr. Releases More Information on Trump Team’s Sidney Powell Statement — And It’s NOT What You Think
As we suspected, the news this evening about Sidney Powell not being on the Trump team is an act to protect Sidney and the Trump team and not a message of disappointment in her latest interviews and actions at all.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3908673/posts
Sidney Powell says she understands White House statement; will keep fighting to prove election was stolen
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3908672/posts
There are going to be some Republicans go down too, maybe some we like.
11 posted on 11/22/2020, 8:20:25 PM by Tejas Rob
Perhaps explaining why you can’t really have the prior arrangement persist... if Sidney has to take out a few RINO’s along the way... you can’t expect the RINO’s to buy the ammo for her big computer game hunting guns ?
The link Between Dominion, Sequoia, Smartmatic, and the CCP ( Warning Twatter will censor you if you post this! )
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3908664/posts
Ran across an interesting wrinkle today... which is worth addressing. This post will present the argument... I’ll address it in the next. From comments at:
Sydney Powell isn’t blowing smoke up our aces:
1. “Who won” goes to the Supreme Court.
2. The Supreme Court dumps the problem on the House of Representatives.
3. One state, one vote for President; Trump won 30 States, Biden won 20.
4. Trump wins!....not so fast.
5. If those 20 states refuse to vote, then we still don’t have a winner [see 12th Amendment below].
6. It goes to the Senate where one of the VP candidates is elected President until the House votes.
7. President Kamala or President Mike?
The Democrats could deny Trump the win for 2 years and try to take the Senate in 2022...we could have 2 years of Kamala or Pence.
[The 12th Amendment]
But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.
(A quorum is the minimum number of members of a deliberative assembly necessary to conduct the business of that group)
(Minimum of 33 states must vote and 26 votes for 1 candidate decides the winner.)
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-12/
Saving this post
Bttt.
5.56mm
The poster is correct... that a quorum for the Congress to decide who the President is... requires “a member from two thirds of the states”. Except, the operative word there is “a”... as in a single member from a state being required to be present.
Here, as always, one guy reading some of the document and taking one part of a rule and reading it wrongly and out of context causes great error.
Let’s start with context in the awareness, perhaps important later, that the clause in question is in the 12th Amendment... and that what the 12th Amendment modifies is Article II, Section 1, and NOT Article I ? The definition of how Presidents are selected is not a Constitutionally defined roll (Article I, Section 7 Legislative Process)or a specified (Article I, Section 8 Powers of Congress) power of Congress... it is instead a Constitutionally defined DUTY for Congress... which is conducted under the management of the President of the Senate... with others present... but subject to his administration of the proceedings.
The rest of the 12th Amendment also conditions the context... and in that instance the operative word is “immediately”...
“The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote... and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate...”
“; — now my favorite new use of keyboard characters
“; — The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; — The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose IMMEDIATELY, by ballot, the President.”
“But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.”
Let’s start with the realization that this is Article 2 we’re talking about... so a quorum to conduct the SPECIFIC business at hand isn’t properly defined anywhere else... and since it IS defined here... uniquely ? Then, that is the rule... one person from a state... fully represents that state well enough.
To make it clear, the poster is right that the Constitution requires in a quorum that 33 states be represented... but it also requires that it is the President of the Senate who holds the gavel and runs the show, the Speaker of the House won’t hold the gavel and can’t control the proceeding, while the Constitution requires only A MEMBER from each state be present... to meet the requirements of a quorum.
If Democrats refuse to show up... ?
First, then, even California will vote for Trump... because Nancy telling Democrats to stay home... won’t stop Devin Nunes from showing up to represent California ? For that plan to succeed... every state with a mixed delegation would need to have every Republican refuse to attend the counting of the votes... to prevent the required quorum.
Note that as... political parties don’t actually have a Constitutional role... but Representatives of States do.
Second, if somehow other efforts “succeeded” in trying to prevent that quorum ?
Article I, Section 5: Powers and Duties of Congress contributes a few other important elements, considered in reverse order:
“Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.”
The Senate actually controls the ability of the House to abscond... some interesting US history there, too... as its not like some of this hasn’t happened before ? But note carefully... “nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting”... since that’s the context the Constitution defines as the requirement for its conduct of the Article II duties.
Otherwise, yes...
“Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members,and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.”
Pelosi might try to not seat Republicans on January 2nd... in order to prevent Devin Nunes showing up to Represent California ? But, that would have to happen BEFORE this event the Constitution defines to select the President ? Pretty hard to pull that off... on January 2nd... when the vote in question was held well prior to that...
Just not very realistic... and it may become much less so as we see election fraud investigations put even more Democrats at risk of losing seats.
Defined by law, Dec 14th is the day electors vote. Certificates recording the electoral vote results in each state must be received by the President of the Senate (and the archivist) no later than Dec. 23. The new Congress are then seated on January 2nd, before the official results of the electoral votes are sent to the newly elected Congress, which meets in a joint session on Jan. 6, 2021, where they will count the electoral college votes and announce the result.
But, stopping that process to obstruct a quorum by not seating the members of the new Congress... to prevent the count occurring... obviously won’t work in states with majority Republican representation. But, that’s not all...
The Senate’s rules apply, with the Presdient of the Senate holding the gavel, so the Senate can COMPEL the presence of those whose participation is required... as the 12th says is required...
So they can’t stop a quorum happening anyway...
And, then... as it is the SENATE and not the House whose rules will be applied in managing the event... Pelosi doesn’t have a gavel to swing to disrupt it...
But, a last wrinkle... if there is no quorum at the event because Democrats in Congress somehow engineered that, and enough Republicans went along with it ?
In the meeting of the Senate and the House... with the compelled presence of a few members as required... Republicans who are present could simply hold a vote and with a simple majority toss the old Speaker of the House out on her ass... and proceed to do whatever else it is they want to do... with all but a few Democrats having decided to stay home and let them do it...
I judge the odds of that are slim... but, in case it does happen... Republicans should have a legislative agenda ready to go...
Many questions arise...
If I mail her $1 and ask her to be my attorney... and she agrees... it means someone is disrupting my communication with my lawyer ?
Is it just me being blocked from that comm link ?
Is it really the military disrupting Powell’s communication?
I’m thinking that’s a much bigger concern than just the need it creates in finding an alternative channel.
Is the military... or someone in the military without fully proper authorization... obstructing communications between U.S. citizens ?
Under what authority would that be justified ?
Are the military posturing to “defend” Powell from my attempt at communication ? Or, are they just obstructing ?
Does Trump know this is happening ?
Original producer of Dominion
The Founder Group, China Mobile, China Telecom, China Unicom, Huawei & ZTE are all deeply connected & owned by the Chinese government
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1329543057381888000.html
I posted earlier about having heard about a guy who bought a voting machine...
He was a Symantic employee named Brian Varner
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmoxE1sJc1c
A lot of my online engagement is market driven. I follow the money. I’m constantly amazed how few people in the market bother to keep track of things that matter a lot in the “big picture”. One of those, obviously, is China, with a range of element in strategic competition unfolding now... from the South China Sea and Taiwan... to the election... Biden’s corruption re China is probably unique mostly in having been exposed. Lots of westerners hoping to get rich in China, and more than willing to sell us out to do that.
But among the various sources of friction... trade and “access” are the biggest issues, still.
On trade, everyone knows Trump has been giving China a hard time... but few people seem aware that the “hard time” Trump has been giving them has come paired with a SCHEDULE. They were supposed to fully live up to the terms of their last trade agreement with Trump... or suffer pain and reversals if they fail. No more pretending that everything is great... when China makes deals they don’t live up to. They aren’t living up to the deal, again, of course... and this time, when they don’t the tariffs will ramp up again... by a lot. The tariffs raised thus far don’t really disadvantage China at all... they only “level the playing field” a bit... they’re basically set at neutral right now.
But that changes AUTOMATICALLY in December, maybe the 14th ?
What a coincidence in timing ?
The other issue... “access”... is about a very little known element of China’s “miracle” economy: it is largely funded by the USA, in some part with China being granted money market access here in spite of their companies not being compliant with our rules for gaining that market access. The other aspect is that their economy is also largely dollar funded... and they need access to a steady flow of dollars just to keep it afloat.
That’s a bit that’s apparent in the link you provided... in relation to one company. Amplify that times... most of them ? China’s companies are deeply in debt... and reaching limits in their ability to keep things afloat. They won’t be able to sustain it if tariffs ramp up... or if access and dollar flows are restricted... but, tariffs, changes in access and money flows ? Stick a fork in them.
Pair up the automatic next leg higher in the tariff schedule (which China is on track to impose on themselves with non-compliance in their agreements, and which puts China at a disadvantage for the first time) with sudden restrictions being placed on access to U.S. markets, and limits being imposed on the dollar flows required to sustain their “miracle” ?
December is going to be interesting...
There’s not “a” hole in their plan... but multiple holes.
Their biggest problem is one that, broadly, boils down to making the error in believing your own propaganda.
They believed, in all the color revolutions, that the tyrants they were attacking were the bad guys... they were destructive, and unpopular... and the good guys were vocal in protest while seeking reforms that we’d all acknowledge as... generally good. Essentially it consisted of a democratic resistance opposing tyrants and seeking freedom.
But, in the U.S. it isn’t Trump who is unpopular, nor is it the Trump team who are the bad guys. Instead, it is Trump insisting on a regime that isn’t corrupt, wholly based on fraud and intent on manipulation of the media while driving an agenda too easily recognized as obvious state propaganda.
Trump is the popular insurgent not the corrupt incumbent who is the problem... and they’re trying to run a “color revolution” against the idea they champion... which can only work when it is run against themselves... not against the popular insurgent who is opposing them.
Its obvious nonsense... to anyone who isn’t taking the propaganda at face value and being gas lit by the media.
So, their biggest problem boils down to my middle finger.
Other issues, though ?
Having put their plans into print... provides a road map of sorts... highlighting many of their high crimes along the way in sufficient detail to make their plans actionable... against them... as it also operates as an admission of treason.
The first: “The concept of “election night,” is no longer accurate and indeed is dangerous.”... both defines what you see emerging in the proofs of the election fraud practiced... and it exposes the faux revolutionaries as they seek to re-write the constitution with a hand wave...
Will SCOTUS go along with George Soros re-writing the U.S. Constitution to enable left wing revolutionaries in taking over the country ? I suspect not.
Another worth noting: “Of particular concern is how the military would respond in the context of uncertain election results. Here recent evidence offers some reassurance, but it is inconclusive”... has them suggesting there have been ongoing and at least potentially successful efforts to recruit traitors in the military. Esper got out ahead of his skis on that one a bit... and its clear there are other Obama-era activists in the military, in the mold of McRaven and Mattis that we clearly can’t trust to adhere to their oaths.
But, when it comes time to uncover and expose a conspiracy against the Constitution... it is always useful to have the conspirators providing you with the outlines of their plans... before they try to implement them... so that you can follow along with their script while you observe them engaging in the act...
China issues...
US-China phase one tracker: China’s purchases of US goods
https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/us-china-phase-one-tracker-chinas-purchases-us-goods
China issues orders to Biden: obey Beijing, do not challenge China’s economic superiority, and open your domestic markets without restraint.
Yeap.. you got it. The US would be a puppet government of China. It’s amazing the number of politicians that are in on this deal. How many realize it might be a different question. Though they know they’re corrupted “for the greater good”
Now that the initial panic some people felt at the news of a bifurcation occurring in the legal strategy:
Two points to make about it.
First, as I’ve noted here already, it divides the attack into two prongs. That’s being fleshed out a bit more today as a deliberate choice: One approach is an attack on the more easily proven aspects of the physical frauds, including the mail-in ballot scams, in which the obvious goal is crafting a Constitutional case, while seeking a Constitutional remedy. The other is an attack on the computerized fraud and the obvious in the requirement of there being an over-arching conspiracy enabling it. While there are over-laps between the two, the computer fraud case is essentially a criminal case, not a Constitutional case.
Second, what’s added to the fray today is pretty simple:
In one Short Tweet, Trump Sr. Advisor Steve Cortes Explains Difference Between Sidney’s Case and Trump’s, “Both Can Work”
https://www.waynedupree.com/2020/11/sidney-powell-2020-election-trump/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.