Posted on 11/08/2020 8:04:58 PM PST by Sense
In this youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&feature=youtu.be
Host L Todd Wood reveals the mechanics behind the electronic vote steal operation in an interview with powerful source.
Violence Against Republicans in Detroit
Wisconsin
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3907262/posts
A clever bit or two there...
Saving $ with only a “partial” recount... just one proof is all you need to make the point well enough. Partial allows cherry picking. Just beating the deadline ? Trump is running out the clock on Democrats. Only as deadlines pass, the hammer should get dropped... and, after deadlines, the litigation continues with the evidence there is...
Rebel Media ties Dominion to Soros...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Er4KWrP1oRs&ab_channel=RebelNews
Detroit Debacle Still Unfolding
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3907259/posts
Free Republic was down last night, relocating due to being deplatformed... when I was posting on the events in Detroit.
In other posting, elsewhere, I noted the Detroit News article on the event should not be trusted to provide a proper description. Seems that was right... as Trump’s tweet, post 31, directly counters the “media narrative”.
The R’s REFUSED TO SIGN THE DOCUMENTS... so, legally, “it never happened”...
Long, boring, dated (given FR down time) clean up on Scytl:
Nov 12 Election Fraud Update from Louie Gohmert, includes Scytl issues update at 4:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvlRMG4EHLI
Doesn’t change much from what he’d said before. Does seem it shows he expects there had to be a dependency that existed, so that Gohmert’s Nov 9 “wee hours Monday morning” response to Trump... “was too late” to enable Presidential action ? If Trump was concerned enough to ask Gohmert to follow up on it the odds are good he was a step or two ahead of the delays inherent in Gohmert’s response time. For convenience in a reference, assume it was my posting, here, that launched the assumed “operation” in Germany ?
My original post Nov 8 at 8:05PM: “It appears Scytl’s servers in Frankfurt Germany would contain critical records exposing the execution of the fraud in detail missing on the log files of the computers here”.
My post Nov 8 at 11:22 PM: “I guess the right way to re-ask the question is... Which Soros owned company might own and operate the Scytl servers in Frankfurt ? Or, if you look at the history of patterns in acquisitions, which formerly Soros owned company”... with a link...
My post Sun, Nov 8 at 11:38 PM: links to the “raid” tweet, which says it was sent at: 12:01 AM on November 8...
Which answers the question, because of 12:01 AM as “12am Monday is midnight on Monday morning and 12pm is midday.”
So the tweet was sent just after midnight on Sunday Nov 8th... about 23 minutes AFTER I posted re the Soros links to servers ? Nope. It was sent at 12:01 Nov 8, or 00:01 on Nov 8th using a 24 hour clock, making it just past midnight early in the morning of Sunday, November 8... 23 hours and 37 minuted BEFORE I posted...
I did not post at 11:38 PM predicting a tweet that wouldn’t happen for another 23 minutes ? Not wanting to disrupt fundamental physical causality here...
Looks like the “take down” happened almost a full day ahead of the posting here...
Which still doesn’t mean very much. The President being encouraging asking Louie to communicate... also shouldn’t be read as meaning he was dependent on that private channel and uninformed otherwise... rather, assume he was asking just to see what else it might turn up ? Any smart operator won’t be dependent on a single random source, and just leave it with that to see what happens... but he also won’t ignore the noise or the chatter that follows in the wake ?
What’s probably more telling... now that we’ve ascertained I wasn’t being clairvoyant... is that after “the raid” was announced here at 11:38PM... the servers DID NOT GO DOWN. You could tell that, because you could still ping them the next day, etc. And, then, a few DAYS later (as covered here from 2 to 3 PM on the 13th) Scytl came out with PR intending to “debunk” the story... which they tried to do with too obvious lies, right after which their servers DID go down ?
Nov 14: Hot Take: The Scytl Raid is Real
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5lhjPKhaKo
Nov 12: Gohmert Expands on Voter Fraud Evidence on Newsmax
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swhlvFBsoDg
Nov 14: Fow with Sidney Powell on how Democrats use dominion to cheat in the election
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB3BHAL28bs
Nov 16: The Affidavit: Sidney Powell With Lou Dobbs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_p1sonhp-k
Otherwise, not selling myself, FR helpers or Louie Gohmert’s efforts short. The effort made here being less than 24 hours behind the timeline the guys with real resources and capabilities were operating on ? We started here at 8pm and had “an answer” before midnight ? Granted, that’s still not pizza delivery fast, but, with the only resource being time spent, a web browser, a search engine, and the cooperation of FR friends... I’d say its pretty damned impressive.
And as that’s still only ONE instance ? Other bits of news noted as worthy of following up on, might generate more timely awareness and have different impact ?
FR activism has proven useful more often than is imaginable.
I do note the Trump team are ON TOP OF THEIR GAME right now.
Democrats... not so much.
Other inputs made have shown Team Trump turn around times that are close to eye watering... while the other side instead seems sluggish and confused...
You know you can’t trust that, though... since the confusion made apparent in public is the end product of their effort as it is seen in others, and is not a proper reflection of confusion in the purposeful planners behind creating it ?
Georgia Related comment:
Notice no one addressing the issue, yet, that Zuckerberg donating >$350 million to fund the hiring of (particular) local elections staff, pollworkers, etc., most notably in Fulton County Georgia, and in Philadelphia... is another instance of the end-around the authority of State Legislatures... in relation to determining the conduct of elections... as the “times, places and manner”... It is an unconstitutional usurpation of power... even in the simple and apparently benign element of funding the installation of ballot drop boxes... A valid argument... that every ballot dropped into a privately funded drop box... is an invalid vote. The effort made directly subverts the Legislatures in their most directive exercise of authority... appropriations and spending.
Arizona related comment:
The problem with the Sharpies in Arizona... isn’t an issue of the ballots marked by Sharpies being unable to be counted by the machine...
The issue is that giving one pen to one group, and another to another group... ensures that the ballots are being made identifiable... THUS ARE NOT SECRET BALLOTS... while ballots thus marked are also made subject to the corruption of the elections staff.
The violation, in result, includes violating the equal protection of those voters who are subjected to unique risks in having their ballots identified by unique markings... markings that are not unique because of their votes... but because the ballots have been made identifiable.
Fun with Statistics:
MI, GA, PA and VA Caught in SAME PATTERN! Once Biden Gained Lead with MASSIVE Vote Dumps, The Remainder of Votes All Possessed Same Biden to Trump Vote Ratio – THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3907375/posts?page=1
Looks like its time to start figuring out WHO DID IT ?
There is a finite number of people with the access required to enable fraud of this nature...
Particularly as it was COORDINATED between states... that requires a further narrowing of people WITH ACCESS who would also be ABLE to conduct that sort of coordination...
Need a map of the relationships between people....
Who do we know that does that kind of work ?
Bookmark
An eventful day today, a large part of which I’ve been unable to access FR. For a part of that FR was up, and I could access the site, but I was unable to sign in and post.
That issue seems it is resolved, now, somehow.
Interestingly, the website isitdownrightnow.com has been reporting FR as “its not just you, FR is down for everyone” during that entire time, but, now, suddenly, it appears that isitdownrightnow.com... is “unavailable”.
Summary posts to catch up a bit...
A press conference held this morning provided a first glimpse of where the Trump teams legal efforts are going, and provided quite a bit of insight into the the structure of the frauds practiced... I’ll come back to that after looking first at Michigan, first, and then Georgia...
Michigan:
GOP Canvassers in Michigan Speak Out After Being Harasssed and Threatened
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zbu2jFQloI
Michigan SOS: MI Republicans To Rescind Their Certification Of Votes | Katy Tur | MSNBC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCz7J61dbdc
Michign’s Secretary of State claims “no legal avenue” to overturn a corrupt result in Wayne County? That’s obviously wrong, both as a matter of process, first?
Also an issue or two in law... the existence of coercion is prima facie reason to overturn any such findings. Not at issue whether they can legally rescind a proper result, but that a coerced result is in itself not legal, nor a proper result.
It is the duty of the Sec. of State, among others, to ensure the result is properly obtained, and is not a product of coercion. So, begin with the obligation the Sec. of State has to ensure that the process that occurs is compliant with the law and delivers a proper result ? That’s clearly not happening in Michigan now, at all, in process or result.
Chapter LXX
PUBLIC OFFICES AND OFFICERS
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(5hpeyse5eoqah3spi2culc5a))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-328-1931-LXX
750.483a Prohibited acts; penalties; “retaliate,”“official proceeding,” and “threaten or intimidate” defined.
(5) A person shall not do any of the following:
(b) Offer evidence at an official proceeding that he or she recklessly disregards as false.
Michigan law defines “coercion” as others might... and makes it a felony to engage in wrongful behavior to influence public process under Section 750, as 750-122:
Prohibited acts; witnesses; threat or intimidation; affirmative defense; violation as felony; penalties; applicability of section; definitions.
Interesting that Michigan imposes an affirmative requirement to disclose, making it a crime to conceal, awareness of treason against the state.
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(5hpeyse5eoqah3spi2culc5a))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-750-545
Testimony of those present suggests an apparent violation of the Michigan law regarding records, which they testify were provided only orally. The legislators should demand they be provided with direct copies of the information so provided, with the failure to provide it being a crime.
tx
Michgan’s state board of canvassers is supposed to meet on Monday.
“this vote should not be certified and the State Board of Canvassers should canvass for an additional period”
They’ll have to take action to prevent a fraudulent result being validated... proper process requiring a full hearing and resolution of the disputed county certifications at the next level, and fulfilling the obligations made to conduct a full audit of the areas of concern, all of which must occur before allowing process to proceed.
Obstructing that... ? See my post prior.
Added here for future reference:
[Ed. One to three percent of Republican non-voters in swing states somehow had a vote recorded for them in 2020. Between 20% to 50% of Republicans in swing states who did vote by mail in 2020 were recorded as having not voted, their votes were not counted.]
brought over
from thedonald.win...
The Results of Matt Braynard’s crowdsourced calling of voters after the election.
TL;DR
In the sample sizes of the study, they found:
A) Out of infrequent Republican registered voters who the State has recorded an Absentee vote in 2020, when called the voter said that they did NOT vote.
MI: 2.8% out of all voters called in the sample
NV: 2.22%
AZ: 0.94%
GA: 0.85%
PA: 0.70%
WI: 0.66%
B) Out of Republican registered voters who requested, received, and stated that they returned the absentee ballot - the State records they did NOT VOTE AT ALL.
AZ: 50.01% out of all in the sample size
PA: 41.86%
GA: 44.08%
MI: 32.61%
WI: 20.00%
https://twitter.com/MattBraynard/status/1329477772822065152
2,189 posted on 11/19/2020, 6:38:08 PM by grey_whiskers
Georgia: Trump-Appointed Judge Rejects Lin Wood’s ‘Creative’ Election Lawsuit in Georgia
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3907731/posts
Is this (or not?) the suit Sidney Powell referenced in the Presser today, mentioning the exhibits in Wood’s suit in GA, which I think was addressing the 11/13 suit addressing the issue that only Legislatures have the power to change election rules as to the “times, places and manner” ?
Giuliani also addressed suits being dropped for lack of standing as “expected”... but the judge’s reasoning isn’t sound, its just a dismissive hand wave, while the language the judge used is beyond condescending and offensive. Rudy hinted today at not ignoring this issue... maybe plan to join the appeal not to alter the standing, but to hammer the standing issue without just obviating it ?
Leaves me not sure what the plan is for Georgia... but, note, the BS others spew about certifications being “game over”... is obviously stupid... save perhaps in the sense that knowingly false certifications are a crime. Otherwise, asked and answered:
Lin Wood
@LLinWood
·
8m
1. A motion to delay certification of GA vote based on a flawed recount was denied this evening by Atlanta Judge Steven D. Grimberg. The oral ruling was unclear but he may have overreached to dismiss my claim that election was unlawful due to @GaSecofState consent agreement
2. The recount issue was separate from unlawful election issue. Sounded like Court thinks a GA voter has NO standing to challenge unlawful federal election. Lawyer for Sec. Of State suggested only state AG could do so. What? AG represents @GaSecofState. Makes no sense.
3. GA voters have rights. It is OUR right to vote. We The People must have legal right to challenge backroom deals cut by state officials. They will not sue each other.
An appeal will be filed to Eleventh Circuit.
I did not do this for GA voters because it was easy. Stay tuned.
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1329597119854997505?s=20
71 posted on 11/19/2020, 5:39:46 PM by LilFarmer
FR Article includes comment:
It was a TRO to delay the certification. There is a wealth of evidence in the exhibits, worth a read.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4f5gvx6oh9zskvf/2020-11-17%20TRO%20Motion%20with%20Exhibits.PDF?dl=0
Wood also has a lawsuit filed 11/13, this is the one that shows that the SOS acted illegally by making a lawsuit settlement deal with democrats in March which changed our election laws without going through GA legislature.
Link to Raffensperger’s settlement deal https://www.dropbox.com/s/fr5xg2jdyimrqa6/SETTLEMENT—GA.pdf?dl=0
FYI - Wood is not on the team of Trump’s lawyers, and he is doing this on his own dime.
30 posted on 11/19/2020, 4:30:45 PM by LilFarmer
The plot thickens in Europe. Who was it that was running the Scytl servers in Frankfurt... that Scytl says wasn’t them ?
I guess now we know why Obama was so anxious to surrender US control of the internet to share our ownership and control of the internet with... whoever?
Scytl... their webpage is back up now...
https://www.scytl.com/en/fact-checking-regarding-us-elections-debunking-fake-news/
has changed their webpage entry on the Frankfurt servers from a flat out denial that they ever existed to this:
The U.S. military has not seized anything related to Scytl in Frankfurt, Barcelona or anywhere else. The company does not even have offices in Frankfurt and does not have servers or computers in the German city.
Servers in Frankfurt were used for a specific project for the European Parliament in 2019. These back-up servers were closed in September 2019.
Scytl now has a document on their page disclosing the Paragon relationship... sort of...
“the transfer of assets to Paragon Group Ltd. (or to a subsidiary of Paragon Group Ltd.)...as part of the process of selling the productive unit of the Company and its subsidiary Platform Civiciti SLU...
Announces their Oct 30 Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders:
https://www.scytl.com/en/resource/convocatoria-de-la-junta-general-extraordinaria-de-accionistas-de-scytl-30-10-2020/
Machine translation from the Spanish:
Call for extraordinary selling meeting Paragon.DOCXCONVOCATORY OF THE EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL BOARD OF SCYTL SECURE ELECTRONIC VOTING, S.A. The board of directors of Scytl Secure Electronic Voting, S.A. (the “Company”) has agreed to convene the shareholders’ meeting at an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders to be held, in the first call at the registered office in Barcelona, Calle Enrique Granados, 84, on 30 October 2020, at 11:00 a.m. and, where appropriate, at the same place and time, the following day, in order to discuss and resolve matters covered by the following ORDER OF DAY 1.Approval, for the purposes of Article 1 60(f) of the Capital Companies Act, of the transfer of assets to Paragon Group Ltd. (or to a subsidiary of Paragon Group Ltd.) consisting, inter alia, of contracts, patents, brands, products and software applications, other assets owned intellectually, contracts with employees of the Company, as part of the process of selling the productive unit of the Company and its subsidiary Platform Civiciti SLU; in the company’s insolvency proceedings before the Commercial Court No. 6 of Barcelona.2.Delegation of powers.3.Reading and approving, if applicable, the minutes.The right of shareholders of the company to obtain from the company, immediately and free of charge, the report of the Board of Directors justifying the proposal submitted to the general meeting for approval.In Barcelona, 29th September 2002 2020. The Deputy Secretary-General, Board Counsel, Silvia Caparrós de Olmedo
Scytl’s research links includes partnerships, including a dead link to the ITC, an archived page of their links is dated 2011, here:
https://itc.napier.ac.uk/itc/projectpartners.asp
A general comment that applies to Scytl and the other companies that are now scrambling to scrub the web of all evidence of their associations...
Their statements of denial include denial of relationships with others I wasn’t aware were an issue ?
Sctyl mentions: Scytl has no relationship with Smartmatic, SGO, Dominion or Indra.
OK. Who are those guys and why is it important to not be connected to them, just now ?
Smartmatic and Dominion are well known now... even if who owns and controls them is still murky.
Whats the SGO and Indra link ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.