Replies

Very interesting info.

It could explain why I got the impression that the PDJT Press Briefing yesterday he was a little too casual, as though he is waiting for something.

I also noticed PDJT put a lot of emphasis on “counting legal ballots and throwing out illegal ballots.

Today, same thing...

” From the beginning we have said that all legal ballots must be counted and all illegal ballots should not be counted, ye we have met resistance to this basic principle by Democrats at every turn.”

https://trulytimes.com/breaking-trump-releases-statement-vowing-to-fight-for-the-integrity-of-this-election-process.html

The process of going through the courts is a mandatory given and evidence must be provided.

There should be records of how many ballots were produced and shipped from all companies providing the printing services.

In the instance of securing the Presidential election the CISA could easily obtained samples of the Machine Identification Code (MIC) from every printer producing VBM ballots that were fire-hosed out in many States.

It might also be a possibility that they do not need hard copy samples, they might already know the codes.

Same thing for the voting systems that use touch screens and then print out the ballot on strips of paper. They produce the same MICs that are unique for each of those printers.

It would not be a tough job to build an optical scanning device to read the code from each ballot and they probably already exist.

The CISA was put together two years ago, you can bet they have gamed out this very senario.