Yep—Just got to convince them.
And Ga., N.C., Mich., and Ariz.
“judge” Roberts says otherwise, and that
it matters not what the English says, given
the gifts and enjoyment he received on Epstein Island.
fine but how do you find those that came in after that time to take those counts out of the total? I hope there is a way but I would be surprised if they left any trace of time of receipt.
That is one route.
The most explosive route will be when an investigation finds where the extra million votes from places like Montgomery and Chester Coa. PA were manufactured. I predict that that conspiracy will break down quickly under lawyer’s questioning, resulting in the destruction of several political machines in the most brazen voter fraud scheme in history.
That’s fine on PA and GA, but Arizona doesn’t look like it’s going to happen.
I’m not calling Pennsylvania either way, but Trump needs more than just Pennsylvania at this point. He also needs Georgia, North Carolina, Nevada, and Alaska. Of those he is most likely to get North Carolina and Alaska, then maybe Pennsylvania. Still not enough to get to 270. One of the few times I’ve been wrong about an election. I really thought he was going to win.
The Supreme Court in the 2000 Bush vs. Gore decision, not only stopped the Florida recount, but it stated that Courts do not have the authority to re-write election law, because the only ones who can write election law is the State Legislature. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court knowingly violated the 2000 Supreme Court decision. Many other courts have as well since this crap started.
They’ve wasted a lot of time, and money in doing so, and I want to know what is going to be done about it.
BKMK
The problem is they were supposed to segregate out the ballots received prior or on Election Day with those ballots received after Nov 3rd. Miraculously, the state claimed they received many fewer late ballots than they expected. This is because they (purposely) MIXED quite a few late arriving ballots with on-time ballots.
This is a concise and very promising analysis. It makes it very clear that although Chief Justice Roberts did not agree to render a rush ruling before the election he did not reject the case altogether. Alito’s response is very encouraging.
This morning on Fox and Friends, Jonathan Turley said that the case in Nevada could be effective in exposing the fraudulent situation with this massive mail-in voting if the Trump team presents compelling evidence of votes from the grave and out of state voters. We know that with the hit of Covid many people left Las Vegas and moved out of state, but they voted in NV. If the case proves out it can have a ripple effect in other states.
I like Dr. Steve but I fear he might be overly optimistic in this case.
The Constitution and the law has never stopped rogue state and federal courts before. Courts fixing this election fraud is a Hail Mary pass in my opinion. The marxists took effective control of the courts long ago.