Posted on 11/05/2020 12:45:23 PM PST by Pining_4_TX
I also noted the predictive programming campaign by the media and members of the Council On Foreign Relations like Max Boot to acclimated the public to the idea of a contested election while also “wargaming” (planning) that exact outcome. I stated:
“…Boot is back again, this time writing about how he thinks Donald Trump will try to “hijack” the presidency in 2020.
In an article for the Washington post titled ‘What If Trump Loses But Insists He Won’, Boot outlines a scenario that was “war gamed” by a group called the Transition Integrity Project. The group played out a scenario in which there is a razor thin victory for Joe Biden, followed by actions by Trump to keep control of the presidency through lies and legal wrangling. The group also predicted civil unrest leading to potential “civil war” as the fight over the White House expands.
This article is, I believe, an attempt at predictive programming by the establishment. They are TELLING US exactly what is about to happen. A contested election, civil war, martial law, economic collapse and the US will be destroyed from within.”
The bizarre behavior of vote counters in swing states, including PA where they stopped the count altogether overnight, indicates a program to incite national tensions and rage. The media refusing to call certain states for Trump even though he held clear leads while rushing to call states for Biden even though the count was far from unfinished will only exacerbate people’s suspicions that the election is being rigged or stolen.
(Excerpt) Read more at alt-market.us ...
Here we go again with the “selected not elected” BS
Maybe he just was right?
‘What If Trump Loses But Insists He Won’
Gee that was their plan all along. Massive vote fraud, Byedon win. Game, set, match.
Think about this—even if millions of ballots were fraudalent, how many individual people participated in the fraud.
I would bet under a thousand.
Everyone else in the country is innocent.
If we want to fight a war, it should be fought against _those_ thousand people.
That would _not_ be a “civil war”.
Think about this—even if millions of ballots were fraudalent, how many individual people participated in the fraud.
I would bet under a thousand.
Everyone else in the country is innocent.
If we want to fight a war, it should be fought against _those_ thousand people.
True.
> I would bet under a thousand.
If you’re counting those that aided and abetted, off by at least an order of magnitude.
Show me 1 and I’d be intrigued.
Good point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.