To: freedumb2003
You don’t need to know who the designer is to know something is designed. For example, ATP synthase - if you were to discover a highly efficient motor that performed a necessary functions with precisely arranged parts, and perfect chemomechanical coupling, would you be allowed to
infer teleology? What would prevent anyone from
making the inference?The questions are rhetorical – it is the dogmatic adherence to naturalism (no design) in biology that prevents the inference (regardless of the truth).
6 posted on
10/27/2020 2:20:12 PM PDT by
Heartlander
(Prediction: Increasingly, logic will be seen as a covert form of theism. - Denyse O'Leary)
To: Heartlander
Nice analogy. I agree completely.
7 posted on
10/27/2020 2:23:05 PM PDT by
dhuls
(better late than never)
To: Heartlander
Darwin said he could not imagine creation being by chance.
He believed in an intelligent First Cause much like the mind of humans. ( see his autobiography)
I suggest Evolution proves Intelligent Design.
19 posted on
10/27/2020 2:53:42 PM PDT by
ARB
To: Heartlander
You don’t need to know who the designer is to know something is designed. Can you point me to a few things in the natural world that weren't designed?
For the word design to have any meaning we need to have examples of undesigned things for comparison.
If everything in the universe has a particular quality that quality has no information value.
37 posted on
10/27/2020 8:43:30 PM PDT by
semimojo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson