Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

The more dangerous precedent would be having a man run roughshod literally over women rugby players.


9 posted on 10/27/2020 6:12:30 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tanniker Smith

“The more dangerous precedent would be having a man run roughshod literally over women rugby players.”

You won’t see this, Men are not allowed to compete with women in woman controlled sports. Softball, volleyball, basketball, soccer and other sports that are determined women’s by the people in charge do not allow men in them. It is acceptable for a woman to be out played in men’s sports because it is expected. But you won’t see the possibility of a man dominating a women’s competition as it destroys the sport. Too much money in the loop.

And in some sports, like gymnastics, the events are different to keep from that happening. Most of the stations are either grace or muscle. And the high muscle pieces like still rings, pommel horse, and parallel bars would require more strength than a vast majority of women have. They wouldn’t be competitive. It’s not a fault. Just nature.

rwood


23 posted on 10/27/2020 7:36:29 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson