If you follow the timeline of the lawsuit it becomes clear than once Hunter had “hidden” the laptop(s) at the repair shop, he could not get them back in the ninety day window because he did not want to pay the stripper, and the lawsuit continued for longer than ninety days.
Very plausible. And don’t forget Hunter has been getting away with outrageous criminal behavior for at least twenty or thirty years. Why would he think any ‘little person’ like a computer repairman could entrap him?
I forgot about the discovery motions from the stripper law suit, so yes repair shop might be a great place to stash the machines, and water damage is destruction of evidence.
I thought I remember Hunter's lawyer delaying the lawsuit for as long as possible?
That could be the reason Hunter couldn't meet the 90-day window.
He missed rhe March 1 deadline to submit financial info to the court.