Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Remember you are allowed to shoot arsonists to protect your property.

New ad: Biden supporter tries to kill dogs and puppies.


21 posted on 10/20/2020 8:27:51 AM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


In a real country, BLM/Antifa terrorists would be hunted down and dealt harshly with.

USSA is being conquered each and every day. In the open; in our face.

Many/most conservatives may as well join the other side, they are so nice, so confused. Babylon we have become, the land of confusion, babbling words of nonsense about a time in a world which does not exist anymore.

Fight for USConstitution or perish. Perishing...


22 posted on 10/20/2020 8:39:22 AM PDT by veracious (UN=OIC=Islam; USgov may be radically changed, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Revolutionary

One should refer to their state’s laws.

Here in WA:

Washington law allows for the use of force under certain circumstances. RCW 9A.16.020 outlines the circumstances under which a person can legally use force. The lawful use of force/self-defense most commonly arises under three situations:

Self Defense
Defense of Others
Defense of Property
Washington’s Self-Defense statute specifically states:

No person in the state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever for protecting by any reasonable means necessary, himself or herself, his or her family, or his or her real or personal property, or for coming to the aid of another who is in imminent danger of or the victim of assault, robbery, kidnapping, arson, burglary, rape, murder, or any other violent crime as defined in RCW 9.94A.030.

See RCW 9A.16.110.

Use of “non-deadly force” is legally authorized when:

Whenever used by a party about to be injured, or by another lawfully aiding him or her, in preventing or attempting to prevent an offense against his or her person, or a malicious trespass, or other malicious interference with real or personal property lawfully in his or her possession, in case the force is not more than is necessary

See RCW 9A.16.020(3).


23 posted on 10/20/2020 8:50:14 AM PDT by RitchieAprile (available monkeys looking for the change..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson