Replies

Seymour Hersch - Seth Rich Was Wikileaks DNC Source (COURT FILING 10/2/2020)

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3895249/posts?page=1

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.194794/gov.uscourts.dcd.194794.268.3.pdf

MR. BOWMAN:· And please state his 15· · · · answer. 16· · · · · · ·MR. QUAINTON:· Would you read back 17· · · · the question that we had before? 18· · · · (The reporter read from the record as 19· · · · follows:· “It’s true that you had a 20· · · · trusted source whom you had known for 31 21· · · · years who communicated information to you 22· · · · about the FBI examining Seth Rich’s 23· · · · computer, finding emails from Seth Rich to 24· · · · WikiLeaks, and requesting payment in 25· · · · exchange.· That is a true statement, is it Page 198 TSG Reporting - Worldwide· YVer1f

Case 1:18-cv-00681-RJL Document 268-3 Filed 10/02/20 Page 6 of 6

·1· · · · · · · ·HERSH - CONFIDENTIAL ·2· · · · not?”) ·3· · · · · · ·MS. GOVERNSKI:· Objection to that ·4· · · · question as well as to the — Mr. ·5· · · · Quainton’s intro into it. ·6· · · · A.· ·My — my answer is it’s absolutely ·7· ·true.· I had a source who communicated ·8· ·secondhand information to me about the issues ·9· ·you raise. 10· ·BY MR. QUAINTON: 11· · · · Q.· ·Going to move to strike everything 12· ·after the words “It’s absolutely true.” 13· · · · · · ·So when you say “doesn’t mean 14· ·true,” does — is what you mean by that 15· ·you could not verify the — the content 16· ·was communicated to you by your trusted 17· · · · A.· ·No, it does not mean that to me. 18· · · · · · ·MS. GOVERNSKI:· Objection. 19· · · · Q.· ·Well, what — what does it mean to 20· ·you, then? 21· · · · A.· ·I made no attempt to verify. I 22· ·didn’t consider it something worth verifying. 23· · · · Q.· ·So what doesn’t make it true, though, 24· ·is the fact that it has not been verified. 25· · · · · · ·MS. GOVERNSKI:· Objection. it’s that of what source? Page 199 TSG Reporting - Worldwide·