Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

I wasn’t even watching msm. I fell in where Q was initially present, on 8ch, and where the compatriot threads were found, with the autists and other intelligent were decoding and sharing research, but before they were so increasingly infiltrated.

Still, Q never disavowed “Anons”. I do see how it works to disavow now. It helps Trump in hand to hand combat with the media.

After all, the Media is like Crockett.. they can attribute to Q and even to the POTUS the worst of the infiltraters to be found among the productive QAnons, who were housed at 8, not far from Q.

It’s a head spinner, but Disinformation is a good thing, quite often. :D


1,265 posted on 10/17/2020 2:35:27 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Publik Skules/Academia -> The Farm team, for more I didMarxists coming. Infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1238 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK

I wasn’t even watching msm. I fell in where Q was initially present, on 8ch, and where the compatriot threads were found, with the autists and other intelligent were decoding and sharing research, but before they were so increasingly infiltrated.

Still, Q never disavowed “Anons”. I do see how it works to disavow now. It helps Trump in hand to hand combat with the media.

After all, the Media is like Crockett.. they can attribute to Q and even to the POTUS the worst of the infiltraters to be found among the productive QAnons, who were housed at 8, not far from Q.

It’s a head spinner, but Disinformation is a good thing, quite often. :D

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I don’t interpret that drop to be disavowing Anons. I think Q is identifying the MSM’s intentional deception in combining “Q” with the “Anons” to come up with one word “QAnon.” The MSM then attributes comments to Q distorted inserted by shill Anons on the chans and 8K. If the MSM said Q said this or that - it’s easily proven false. But by using the term QAnon, the MSM poses shill content as Q content.


1,272 posted on 10/17/2020 2:42:25 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1265 | View Replies ]

To: RitaOK
Still, Q never disavowed “Anons”. I do see how it works to disavow now.

Wait, what? When did Q disavow 'anons'?

There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Q

He disavowed 'Qanons' pointing out that there is only Q and anons.

The media mashes both terms into one in order to discredit the entire movement/operation by tagging it with so-called Qanon tom-foolery.

Sidenote: This is why some here pushed back on #TeamWhiteHat so hard. Amongst other things.


1,274 posted on 10/17/2020 2:45:50 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1265 | View Replies ]

To: RitaOK

There are Anons.

And then there is a phrase used by msm - Qanon.

Totally different.


1,285 posted on 10/17/2020 2:57:50 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1265 | View Replies ]

To: RitaOK
Still, Q never disavowed “Anons”. I do see how it works to disavow now.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Q has not disavowed anons, but cannot be held responsible for what anons have posted. Obviously some of it is innocently wrong and some is posted by our enemies in an attempt to "Poison the well"---a standard disinformation tactic.

1,310 posted on 10/17/2020 3:56:08 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian (The next war has already started.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson