I didn’t ever understand there are no QAnons. I’m
a little taken back..
The moniker/term, “Anons”, has been referenced from the beginning and yet so far as I know, Q never posted an objection, correction or clarification of the term.
This may be to the fault of 8ch. Q was there and so were the anonymous followers of Socrates Q.
There were “autists” on board, for use of their gifts of deciphering and for looking at Q questions. These were not directly classified as “Q”, or MI, to my knowledge, but lumped in with research Anons, instead, on the forbidden chans, and everywhere, among all who were following the Q map, the Q clock and Q questions.
I didn’t ever understand there are no QAnons. I’m
a little taken back..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I kept thinking I was “doing it wrong” when I saw QAnon and still used Q Anon myself (old fashioned). I always saw QAnon in the MSM though...I guess that should have tipped me off, but it didn’t. “MSM Man Bad!”
There were “autists” on board, for use of their gifts of deciphering and for looking at Q questions. These were not directly classified as “Q”, or MI, to my knowledge, but lumped in with research Anons, instead, on the forbidden chans, and everywhere, among all who were following the Q map, the Q clock and Q questions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also, I thought there were Autists and Anons on the Chans, and we were “Normies” ‘cause we don’t hang out there and decipher the geographic location of videotaped flag poles for fun...(e.g., Shia LaBeouf). I still feel like Normie as there are no flag pole analyses in my future.
Maybe it just evolved. Rather than saying “Q fans” folks preferred to say QAnons.
As I recall the introduction was “Q level patriot” or something like that. This followed “FBIAnon” ... but “Q” never used “QAnon”
Now that they have been shamed someone might ask the right question.