Posted on 10/15/2020 12:24:27 PM PDT by ransomnote
I’m a late riser (8:15) and I rarely look at anything electronic until after 9:00 a.m., and then I typically start where I left off the night before when I come here, so it takes me awhile to catch up :)
bttt
bbb
Those are very funny. That one with Witmer made a bingo in my mind. She looks and acts like a Nazi witch dominatrix and her name sure sounds German. Hmmmmmmmm
+1 from this Canuck.
Try https://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/judicial-watch-voter-roll-study-oct-2020/
The earlier source from thedonald.win, looks like it is in plaintext and rounded off.
Welcome to the thread PeriwinkleMinniepaws! I’ve been following for quite a long time and this thread has blessed my life, prepared me for truth, and given me information that I would otherwise never have known. I don’t post a lot but I am always lurking about and praying for those who do post. Hope you enjoy these great folks!
What about the date set in the current Constitution?
First Tuesday in November.
Thank you. They do seem like great folks who share my values.
POTUS GOT SOME NEW MOVES!!!! @realDonaldTrump you are a hoot and a half and the country loves you!!!! #MAGA pic.twitter.com/CCfHTBtJr2— Brian Clowdus (@BrianClowdus) October 16, 2020
Yeah way past time to get some big fish indictments. What did John Huber get done? How long as Durham been at it? Last thing in the world we want is Trump losing and these investigations get shut down. Now is the time to release the dogs of war on the Deep State.
The Tuesday after the first Monday in November was set by an act of Congress in the 1840s. It’s not in the Constitution.
That would fit a pattern. The elites can get pretty women just fine. The ultimate turn on for them may be to have a pretty girl completely in his power, to use as he wishes.
This is something only dictatorship can provide.
Publius wrote:
“The Tuesday after the first Monday in November was set by an act of Congress in the 1840s. It’s not in the Constitution.”
Ok, a question on your post #784:
“The date of federal elections was set by Congress back in the 1840s. As long as a new date doesn’t conflict with those dates specified by the Constitution, all is OK.”
What dates were specified ?
I searched and found this site, which talks about whether the election could be postponed; cites the dates noted in the Constitution regarding when the electors meet and when the President’s terms of office end:
https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/does-the-constitution-allow-for-a-delayed-presidential-election
Sadly, we’re not there yet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think Trump is winning. I don’t know if he would be so well if he had taken on the sacred cows of the left right before the election by now. The indoctrination on the left is so intense, they would/will likely view exposures as traumatic. Surely there’d be wide spread civil unrest planned for any top level arrest/indictment. That nationwide unrest would be used to force mail in voting or otherwise disrupt election and it would be “Trump’s fault”.
By taking on Biden’s son, they haven’t stopped the #WALKAWAYs. I dont’ know what lies ahead but I see the exposures being handled masterfully, and at the pace the public can accept and (reasonably) follow. The information seems to be being doled out in manageable doses and it is exposing Biden Sr. I shudder to use the word “exposing” in the same sentence as “Biden”; Jr’s “obsession” with children will daily remind many of Sr’s obsession with children. *shudder*
Good article. Thanks.
I agree with your reasoning. Too much too soon would be a problem. New Q!
Insert Kirstie Ally?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.