Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barrett apologizes for calling sexual orientation a 'preference'
Politico ^ | 10/13/2020 | Matthew Choi

Posted on 10/13/2020 6:47:37 PM PDT by utford

Amy Coney Barrett apologized Tuesday for referring to sexual orientation as a "preference" during the second day of her Supreme Court confirmation hearing.

"I certainly didn't mean and would never mean to use a term that would cause any offense to the LGBTQ community," Barrett said, after questioning by Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii). "So, if I did, I greatly apologize for that. I simply meant to be referring to Obergefell's ruling with respect to same-sex marriage."

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Religion
KEYWORDS: acb; antichristian; gaystapotactics; homofascism; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; pollutico
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

Never apologize——sign of weakness to them....

So true. All the RINOs spent decades “reaching across the aisle” in Congress and apologizing to the Black Caucus and retracting the wrong word on a TV statement. Or admitting to marching in the Columbus Day Parade ten years ago instead of the new Indigenous Peoples’ Day one.

On the defensive they looked like criminals out on parole whom society now barely tolerated. Jeb Bush and Kasich are examples.


41 posted on 10/13/2020 7:21:31 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud,harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Agreed. she could have said something like “I might have used different wording” and left it at that.


42 posted on 10/13/2020 7:22:36 PM PDT by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: utford

Answer like the dems do.......just misspoke.


43 posted on 10/13/2020 7:25:00 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger
So why do all of the 98% have to have TV ads, family show plots on TV, special rights to LGBTQ, careful wording to avoid a mistake in the dozens of alleged genders when we talk and all this BS? For 2%?

For the same reason that the 13% are in 75% of commercials and 60% programming and if you're not in a mixed marriage in a commercial then you aren't watchable. The television industry drives more folks to watch old shows and old dvd's more than broadcast. I haven't seen any of the 3 main alphabet channels I grew up with using the old rabbit ears in years.

44 posted on 10/13/2020 7:25:04 PM PDT by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: utford

Are they implying that homosexuals don’t prefer to be homosexuals, that they would prefer to be something else?


45 posted on 10/13/2020 7:25:28 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

Romans 1:18-32 say why.

Supporting homosexuality in society is kinda like a canary that has died in a coal mine. It is a sign that tells you that something has already happened, in this case people have departed from the knowledge of the Lord.

This isn’t really about a sub 2% deviancy (2% was probably too much) ... it’s about the broad road that leads to destruction that many are on.


46 posted on 10/13/2020 7:25:53 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I wish I were questioned by a Senate committee.

I wish you were, too.

"Senator, when did you stop covering for the felonies of Hillary Clinton?"

Sen. Feinstein are you ready to apologize to the American people for giving security secrets to your Chinese spy limo driver, or do you refuse out of disdain for them?"

"Did you take lying lessons from Schumer or did you use your own past history to perfect it?"

They would be saying "We call for these hearings to be cut short. We have enough statements to proceed."

47 posted on 10/13/2020 7:26:02 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud,harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: utford

No one knows for sure the origin. Catholic teaching, from where she states she gets at least her personal philosophy, states only that homosexuals are to be celibate. Of course it also calls for modesty, as does natural law, so all of this talk about, and push for sex violates modesty. Some people may be born with it. I imagine it is a preference in many, perhaps most cases. Barrett May have been apologizing to them

I doubt she is a wimp


48 posted on 10/13/2020 7:29:01 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Good points. I thought little former Mayor Pete had a lot of nerve to preach that others are not following the Bible while he quickly thumbed past many passages directly condemning homosexuality.
I doubt he and his “husband” (barf) spend any time on the Holy Scriptures.


49 posted on 10/13/2020 7:29:50 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud,harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: utford

Say “shibboleth”


50 posted on 10/13/2020 7:31:55 PM PDT by Persevero (I am afraid propriety has been set at naught. - Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utford

Don’t back down, Councilor.


51 posted on 10/13/2020 7:31:55 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheWriterTX

One can train one’s mind.

We are not potatoes.


52 posted on 10/13/2020 7:32:43 PM PDT by Persevero (I am afraid propriety has been set at naught. - Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ric Grenell tweeted that anyone in that constituency offended by a single word needs to grow up, so he’s not having any of your drama, Nutcase Mazie!


53 posted on 10/13/2020 7:34:10 PM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: utford

So in the United States we are not free to have a sexual preference?


54 posted on 10/13/2020 7:46:14 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

bingo


55 posted on 10/13/2020 7:59:15 PM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: utford

Didn’t the left come up with the “sexual preference” thing in the first place?

Oh, right, the left doesn’t have to be consistent about anything.


56 posted on 10/13/2020 8:08:34 PM PDT by TigersEye (In all things ... trigger discipline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utford

I don’t understand how saying “preference” implies choice. I have certain food preferences. They aren’t choices. I cannot help but prefer carbs.


57 posted on 10/13/2020 8:08:38 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utford

After a round of questioning by Mazie I would be totally confused as well. In fact, I think we all were.


58 posted on 10/13/2020 8:23:01 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utford

so if it isn’t a preference WTH is it?

and what a ridiculous line of questioning’
let’s end this farce, refer her for a floor vote, and get her confirmed NOW!


59 posted on 10/13/2020 8:23:02 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (Politicians are not born, they are excreted. Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utford

Never, ever, ever, ever...NEVER apologize to ANYONE who says they feel “offended”.
It will never end


60 posted on 10/13/2020 8:24:28 PM PDT by grobdriver (BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson