No, Obamaite are your fallacies.
I am not advocating trade with Cuba just pointing at the fact that it is between US and Europe and according to your own faulty logic has to benefit or have a say in it. What would be your opinion if Cuba rules that US can’t import sugar cane from Africa and fines importers? It would be rather laughable.
What makes the situation different?
As for ‘sovereign ruling’ let Poland rule on Polish matters.
NS2 is nowhere near Poland. Every country located in proximity of it ruled positively in it.
In the end the project is a sovereign matter of involved parties which are Russia and Germany.
There is nothing anti-American in it.
US is not Russia or Germany, it is their issue and both sides are okay with it.
I don’t remember any of them expressing concerns about dependence of Mexico or Canada on US trade and how Cuba or Bolivia are disadvantaged as a result.
They realize that it is not their business to say respective parties who else has to benefit from this trade or a lack of it.
Where’s the fault in my logic? You didn’t point it out.
You, however, have used “ad lapidem”, “ad verecundiam”, and several cases of “ad hominem” to “explain” why Poland has no right to defend her sovereignty.
The EU proclaims a so- called single market”, but you’re justifying an exception in the case of one country, an exception even Trump opposes.