Bob —my thoughts.....maybe I’m being wildly optimistic, but why should there even be hearings on ACB? She already went through a vetting process 2 years ago when she was appointed Circuit Court Judge. Why go through that again? What would have changed in the 2 years? Why not have Yurtle just have Lindsey just go to a vote after hearing remarks by ACB? This would be done in days, not weeks.
Yeah, the Dims will yowl. So? All they would do is smear her —I think if he did allow questions, the first mean, disgusting word or question that comes out of a Dem’s mouth (and you KNOW it will happen), Graham shuts down the questioning, and calls for a floor vote the next day. Boom! She’s in well before the election!
Yes, that was exactly my point. Why open the door for mud slinging?
***I think if he did allow questions, the first mean, disgusting word or question that comes out of a Dems mouth (and you KNOW it will happen), Graham shuts down the questioning, and calls for a floor vote the next day. Boom! Shes in well before the election!***
When Grassley opened hearings on Kavanaugh, I think it was the first day, the Dems angrily made a motion that the hearings be immediately closed. I told my son: he should have agreed and immediately called for a vote - for which he had a majority.
Had he done that all that filth that the 'rats vomited out of their corrupt brains would have been avoided {remember they consistently accuse their opponents with the horrors that they themselves are guilty of.} There are SCOTUS judges that did not undergo hearings - back in the days when Dems were demonstrably human beings.
Graham is making a stupid mistake unless he plans to immediately shut down the hearings when the filth starts pouring out. We need to remember that the Grassley hearings were almost at a conclusion when DiChiFi threw her stink bomb into the proceedings and it was obvious that what followed had all been planned - with the MSM screaming like a flock of offended crows.
Naturally the intimidated 'pubbies immediately caved in. 😖