Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BACKGROUNDER – LATER on Amy Coney Barret – NOW on Barbara Lagoa
Internet/Research Opinion ^ | September 25, 2020 | Hostage

Posted on 09/25/2020 12:04:23 PM PDT by Hostage

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
I know a lot of you really like Amy and so do I. But I hope I’ve filled in some blanks for you about Barbara because you likely won’t hear much about her from state media unless it’s a pack of lies about her character and past.

But Barbara would best be chosen for now with Amy coming up for the next go-round.

And then after that? Because there could very well be an after that.

Why there's Sidney Powell who would be an Icon either as a Supreme Court Justice or as an Attorney General following Bill Barr should he retire in POTUS's second term.

Future for justice looks bright!

1 posted on 09/25/2020 12:04:23 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Future for justice looks bright!

Only if 1/21/2021 becomes NATIONAL MASS FIRINGS DAY in Washington, D.C.


2 posted on 09/25/2020 12:07:25 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Pile of dog crap

Barret is a great pick

Barbara is a great pick as well

Why do we still listen to fake news?


3 posted on 09/25/2020 12:08:28 PM PDT by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
But ask liberals if they will accept Barbara Lagoa and they will jump in their vans, show up at your home at 2 am with their BLM comrades and set your garden on fire.

I heavily disagree! Lagoa was confirmed to the court by an 80 to 15 vote. Democrats love her, and we should have a problem with that. I would rather President Trump nominate a woman previously confirmed along party lines, and not one that Democrats previously crossed party lines to confirm. We don't need another turncoat Supreme.

4 posted on 09/25/2020 12:09:33 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Agreed.


5 posted on 09/25/2020 12:09:59 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; Admin Moderator

You posted this once and it was removed......are you looking to get banned?


6 posted on 09/25/2020 12:12:00 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Hey dummy!

It was I as in MOI that requested it be pulled.

Because I hit the post bouton by mistake before it was ready.

Now go back to sleep.


7 posted on 09/25/2020 12:14:09 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
But I hope I’ve filled in some blanks for you

Praise Jeebus, you're so much smarter than the rest of us.
We are all like little special-ed kids compared to you.

You should have a blog so you could teach us to be smart.

We all so stoopy.

8 posted on 09/25/2020 12:14:42 PM PDT by humblegunner (Balls To Picasso.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Do you actually try to force your IQ lower or were you just born that way?


9 posted on 09/25/2020 12:15:53 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
But ask liberals if they will accept Barbara Lagoa and they will jump in their vans, show up at your home at 2 am with their BLM comrades and set your garden on fire. Seriously, they will fill their media about how Lagoa skins cute little puppies alive for her backyard barbecue roasts.

Bullshit

her nomination was reported out of committee by a vote of 18–4.[22] On November 19, 2019, the Senate invoked cloture on her nomination by a vote of 80–15,[23] and on the next day, November 20, confirmed her nomination by a vote of 80–15

Most democrats voted FOR Lagoa, both in committee and in the Senate. Tell me again how much they hate her


10 posted on 09/25/2020 12:18:04 PM PDT by Pollard (You can’t be for “defunding the police” and against “vigilantism” at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Do you actually try to force your IQ lower

I don't post threads pretending to educate people
after insulting their intelligence. So there's that.

Show us your Captain Smarty Guy badge.

11 posted on 09/25/2020 12:18:52 PM PDT by humblegunner (Balls To Picasso.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

They love her? or are afraid to vote against her?


12 posted on 09/25/2020 12:18:52 PM PDT by TiGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

Good point but Barrett clerked for Scalia and the Democrat Senate hated Scalia whereas they ned Florida and knew Lagoa was popular there.

Still Barrett gathered 55 votes for confirmation so there were a group of Democrats that voted for her.

She also was voted in late 2017 when the Russia Hoax was in full swing and the Democrats were grouped a rabid pack of zombies.

Whereas Lagoa was confirmed in early 2017 soon after President Trump had taken office when everything was sunshine and roses.

Don’t fall for the vote tallies, Democrats hate both of them.


13 posted on 09/25/2020 12:24:55 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

Oh my! Don’t tell me, your father failed to whip your behind when you stepped out of line?

See #13.

The vote tallies were all about the timeline in 2017.

If the times of their confirmations had been reversed, their vote tallies would have reversed as well.


14 posted on 09/25/2020 12:28:00 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Barbara Lagoa got 80 votes for confirmation - so what in the world makes you think the left would go nuclear over her, while accepting Barrett? Lagoa is the typical GOP “stealth” pick that always comes back to bite us in the butt. See: Warren Burger, David Souter, Anthony Kennedy, John Paul Steven...


15 posted on 09/25/2020 12:31:37 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

#13.

She was confirmed in very early 2017 when Trump was in a honeymoon. All newly elected Presidents get a honeymoon but Trump’s was cut short by the Russia Hoax.

By the latter part of 2017, the Democrat Senate was in full attack mode on anything Trump. If Trump said he was for blue skies and sweet red roses, the Senate Democrats would have said he was a traitorous Russian puppet.

And along comes Amy and BAM!


16 posted on 09/25/2020 12:35:36 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
I can't begin to tell anyone which one of these two ladies would make a better justice.

I can tell you with absolute certainty, however, that either of them will make a better one than Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

17 posted on 09/25/2020 12:39:22 PM PDT by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Joining what I see is a last minute GOP-e campaign to replace Barrett with Lagoa as the nominee?

I’ll pass... as I suspect most others would.


18 posted on 09/25/2020 12:43:04 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

no link


19 posted on 09/25/2020 12:46:13 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CREEP ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trump.Deplorable

I think they are both great picks. Trump sometimes does the opposite that he tends to let people believe.

My only thought, is if Barrett is questionable, why did she have 43 votes against her?

Trump is giving us the idea it will be Barrett, but I’m thinking he’s going to pull a switcheroo, and pick Lagoa.

I also think he’ll leak out the pick tomorrow morning.


20 posted on 09/25/2020 12:47:07 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson