~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Very true ... and yet ... the plaintive question by the shill reporter at the end: "Who is Q?"
It's been 50 years since I read Ayn Rand, but I heard echoes of "Who is John Galt?"
See Q-4754.
For the record, the statistics ARE correct as represented in the Tweet from Aussie journalist Adam Creighton, and retweeted by Laura Ingraham.
The stats were presented by the CDC on Sept 10,2020 as their "CURRENT BEST ESTIMATE" for the "Infection Fatality Ratio" of people who contract the Chinavirus in various age groups.
Here's the tweet picked up by Ingraham and then Q:
Adam Creighton @Adam_Creighton The US govt last week updated the survival rates (i.e., IF infected) for Covid19: 0-19 99.997% 20-49 99.98% 50-69 99.5% 70+ 94.6% Didn't see it reported much./\/\/\/\/\/\/\
CHINAVIRUS DATA:
1. United States CHINAVIRUS Confirmed Cases through about mid-June
2. Highly (and Deliberately) Contaminated Data from mid-June Forward
(contaminated with antibody-test, duplicates, false positives and dubious "Probables")
3. Another Layer of Fraud in both deaths and Cases was added 7/28
Date New Total Linear Mod
Cases Cases Since
Actual + FAKE Actual + FAKE 5/9/2020
6/1/2020 22,153 1,859,323 1,861,589
6/15/2020 20,806 2,182,950 2,174,629
6/30/2020 46,042 2,727,853 2,510,029
7/1/2020 52,100 2,779,953 2,532,389
7/15/2020 71,670 3,616,747 2,845,429
7/30/2020 66,948 4,634,985 3,180,829
7/31/2020 70,904 4,705,889 3,203,189
8/1/2020 58,429 4,764,318 3,225,549
8/15/2020 53,523 5,529,789 3,538,589
8/30/2020 34,158 6,173,236 3,873,989
8/31/2020 38,560 6,211,796 3,896,349
9/1/2020 45,775 6,257,571 3,918,709
9/15/2020 38,858 6,788,147 4,231,749
9/16/2020 40,154 6,828,301 4,254,109
9/17/2020 46,295 6,874,596 4,276,469
9/18/2020 51,345 6,925,941 4,298,829
9/19/2020 41,462 6,967,403 4,321,189
9/20/2020 37,365 7,004,768 4,343,549
9/21/2020 41,448 7,046,216 4,365,909
9/22/2020 51,721 7,097,937 4,388,269
9/23/2020 41,616 7,139,553 4,410,629