Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: magglepuss

I would call it a criminal violation of their civil rights. Also assault and battery, just coming up and starting to grab at that girl. Unfortunately it turns out we don’t have much recourse when it comes to defending our civil rights.


1,477 posted on 09/26/2020 6:50:43 AM PDT by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1465 | View Replies ]


To: ichabod1

Unfortunately it turns out we don’t have much recourse when it comes to defending our civil rights.


With a few minor tweaks, that we should demand, we can protect our civil rights.

Currently, police have qualified immunity. In other words, if they make a mistake and get sued, the police dept. must pay restitution. Or, in other words, the taxpayer. QI is necessary to protect police from being expected to know every nuance in the law. HOWEVER, if a police officer willingly violates someones Constitution right, he/she should pay it himself. Threat of losing ones job is really not enough, because we don’t know if they will actually be fired or not from a corrupt police force.

Just like threat of arrest makes people comply, threat of losing ones qualified immunity should work as well.

It would not take to many police officers having to pay out 40 to 50k for this nonsense to stop.


1,482 posted on 09/26/2020 7:13:43 AM PDT by magglepuss (if Q support is good enough for POTUS, it should be good enough for FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1477 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson