Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: oldplayer
Actually, the Union did hold some territory in Confederate lands that this applied to.


3 posted on 09/22/2020 5:58:49 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (The only thing worse than COVID-19 is Biden-20!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!

Dear Alas,
Of course there was territory and parts of States that were controlled by the Yankees. But the Proclamation was about States, not territory, conquered or not.


4 posted on 09/22/2020 6:29:45 AM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!

“Actually, the Union did hold some territory in Confederate lands that this applied to.”

That is quite misleading. Your map shows a very small amount of land held by the Union. Lincoln’s proclamation had no impact on the overwhelming majority of land in the south. In 1962 that was the vast amount of land that was not affected by his proclamation.

It was a purely political move on the part of the tyrant Lincoln as was the Emancipation Proclamation which had no impact on the states that seceded. So, if slavery was so important to Lincoln why did he wait three years after the war began to issue the proclamation? I know. A political stunt!

The victors get to write history, so that is their story. By the way, the mood of the nation is not much different today — except slavery is not the issue, although its cousin, BLM is. Who really knows how this election and the aftermath will turn out? One thing is certain, the story will carry the slant of the winner.


10 posted on 09/22/2020 8:07:39 AM PDT by icclearly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson