The paper By Dr. Yan and co-authors is an expert’s opinion on the origins of Covid-19 virus. It uses known/published scientific literature sources to argue, using logic and common sense, why the virus could not have come from the nature. It doesn’t contain any physical/experimental data proving that that virus is a man-made creature. In a sense, Dr. Yan is not a classical whistle-blower as she never worked in the Wuhan lab. In addition, Dr. Yan and her co-authors present (in the paper) a detailed plan (theoretical) how somebody intent on creating such a virus could successfully use tools of modern molecular biology.
The paper is written in a logical and concise manner and every point that the authors make is supported by a reference to the source in scientific literature. In addition, the authors went to great pains trying to make the article understandable to the non-scientific audience, which impressed me a lot.
A significant number of arguments made in the paper have been raised by multiple researchers starting in the beginning of pandemic. Dr. Yan discusses those points and adds a number of original ideas (such as presence of two targets for specific enzymes - restrictases - in the viral genome that could’ve been used in for genome manipulations).
The MSM is in full offensive mode against Dr. Yan who is a true whistleblower.
She was deeply connected to the WHO viral reference institute in Hong Kong with early responsibility to identify the source of the COVID virus long before Steve Bannon had ever heard of her.
Only after she escaped with her life to the US befire China’s national security law came into effect, with the help of the anti-CCP billionare Miles Guo Wen Kuei did she get introduced and featured by Bannon’s Warroom pandemic podcast and TV show.
Now, she is gaining more prominence with Tucker Carlson interviewing her in prime time.
And her paper should be scrutinized ON SCIENTIFIC GROUNDS. Just because it was published with the help of Bannon does not necessarily mean that its contents are without merit.
That it was uploaded into an OPEN site where everyone, including those in the scientific community, can read it, Makes it, IN EFFECT, available for review, even peer review.
I was told by a doc friend of mine (former USA officer, CBW expert) this back in early May.