You need to read 106 as well.
Seeing more of the pattern.
I will engage you in this debate, but not if you continue to use language like "you are so wrong it is ALARMING!" and "Are you actually this stupid, or are you just extremely ignorant?"
Why do I need to read 106? It assumes full participation; the Constitution did not.
Since you pinged my post you know that I cited the parts of the Constitution that shows the Electoral College requires a majority of appointed Electors, not a majority of *maximum possible* Electors. States that fail to certify their elections in time for the Electoral College do not participate because they failed to appoint Electors.
Do you disagree with that? If so, why?
-PJ