Exactly so.
No computer can beat a chess master.
But a team of chess players who program a computer to play chess can beat a chess master.
The team beat the master...the computer is no smarter than a stone.
AI is a myth, simulated AI is real.
You can create a robot that can perform surgery but it will ALWAYS be the team of surgeons and programmers that are actually doing the surgery.
There is a huge difference between intelligence and a programmed simulation of intelligence and there always will be.
When start your reasoning with an error, guess what you results are likely to be: “No computer can beat a chess master.” Already been done, dude.
“AI is a myth, simulated AI is real.”
Semantics. AI attempts to replicate our brains.
“AI is a myth, simulated AI is real.”
Semantics. AI attempts to replicate our brains.
“You can create a robot that can perform surgery but it will ALWAYS be the team of surgeons and programmers that are actually doing the surgery.”
Hey now, on behalf of all computer programmers I am going to need to ask you to hush up before we all have to start buying malpractice insurance!
Artificial Flowers aren’t Flowers
and
Artificial Intelligence isn’t Intelligence
they are but mere shadows of what they can only pretend to be.
7
RE: No computer can beat a chess master.
IBM’s Deep Blue defeated then, world chess champion, Gary Kasparov in 1997.
Exactly so.
No computer can beat a chess master.
But a team of chess players who program a computer to play chess can beat a chess master.
The team beat the master...the computer is no smarter than a stone.
AI is a myth, simulated AI is real.
...
AI these days is programmed to self learn, and after a couple of hours of playing against itself, it can beat the best human chess player every time.
You are correct.
But there’s something very seductive about AI. As a result, if you diminish it’s value, those who believe in AI will respond as though you’ve insulted their girlfriend.
Just like pot smokers—it’s their best friend and you can’t criticize it.
So like is yoga to exercise, AI is the marijuana of technology.
AI is not a myth, but there is no guarantee that the discriminators the AI pattern recognition will decide to use. To AI. in my experience, correlation is equal to causation. To imaginative intelligence, correlation is a clue to potential causation.