Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beaverton Woman Charged with Civil Disorder After Targeting Police Officers with High-Powered Laser
justice.gov ^ | September 3, 2020 | U.S. Attorney’s Office District of Oregon

Posted on 09/03/2020 4:27:51 PM PDT by ransomnote

PORTLAND, Ore.—Eva Warner, aka Joshua Warner, 25, of Beaverton, Oregon, has been charged by criminal complaint with civil disorder, a felony, after targeting the eyes of multiple law enforcement officers with a high-powered laser during an August 8, 2020 riot in North Portland.

According to court documents, in the late evening on August 8, 2020, a riot was declared at the Portland Police Association office on North Lombard Street in Portland after individuals broke windows and set fire to the office. The crowd also used vehicles and dumpsters to illegally block nearby vehicle traffic.

Oregon State Police officers notified the Portland Police Bureau’s Rapid Response Team that Warner had directed a high-powered, green laser into the eyes of numerous law enforcement officers attempting to disperse the riot. Warner resisted arrest, prompting officers to use force. Officers found a black, pen-style laser pointer on Warner’s person. Warner was taken into custody and later released.

On September 2, 2020, Warner was arrested by the U.S. Marshals Service in a southeast Portland apartment without incident.

Warner appeared in federal court today before a U.S. Magistrate Judge and was released pending further court proceedings. If convicted, Warner faces a maximum sentence of five years in federal prison.

This case was investigated by the FBI with assistance from the U.S. Marshals Service. It is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Oregon.

A criminal complaint is only an accusation of a crime, and a defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Component(s): 
 


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: antifa; evawarner; joshuawarner; portland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Jane Long

Eye for an eye?


41 posted on 09/03/2020 6:29:42 PM PDT by Texas resident (Remember in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

Assisting officer, Mike Rotch.


42 posted on 09/03/2020 7:17:33 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ronniesgal

They hate themselves so they are attracted to a movement design to punish, attack and destroy normal society.


43 posted on 09/03/2020 7:20:17 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Oregon State Police officers notified the Portland Police Bureau’s Rapid Response Team that Warner had directed a high-powered, green laser into the eyes of numerous law enforcement officers attempting to disperse the riot. Warner resisted arrest, prompting officers to use force. Officers found a black, pen-style laser pointer on Warner’s person. Warner was taken into custody and later released.


I will have to call b.s. on this. A laser pointer, although obnoxious is not a high powered laser. However, the recipients of the laser light have no way of knowing if they are being simply annoyed or are being blinded. Using a laser pointer on police, should be illegal and may be illegal, even if it is not a high powered laser.
44 posted on 09/03/2020 7:23:37 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie ( DeBlasio is the killer of NYC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Was it a basement apt. Rented by his mom?


45 posted on 09/03/2020 7:35:07 PM PDT by HP8753 (Live Free!!!! .............or don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Biblical justIce would require an equitable penalty. Shine the laser in the perps eyes and see how quickly this evil will stop.


46 posted on 09/03/2020 7:51:23 PM PDT by nonsporting (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Get rid of all Magistrates regarding criminal affairs. They are useless.


47 posted on 09/03/2020 8:04:42 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

I must respectfully disagree. Although many laser pens are in the range of a few mW (milliwatts),many are available from 500mW (1/2 Watt) up to 5000 mW (5 Watts) and higher.

Devices rated higher than 500 mW are rated Class 4 devices and can cause serious injury with either direct or reflected exposure.I worked for laser companies for 15 years and laser eye safety is no laughing matter.


48 posted on 09/03/2020 8:25:22 PM PDT by Red Patriot in Blue California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

Sort of, I guess.


49 posted on 09/03/2020 8:36:22 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I never can understand how the police figure out exactly where the laser is coming from.


50 posted on 09/04/2020 2:48:11 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

omg....groan.


51 posted on 09/04/2020 2:48:41 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A strike; dsrtsage; PubliusMM
Sorry dude, attacking a LEO with a potentially blinding laser is not unserious, but I think I get your point. I would like these domestic terrrorists to be charged with riot, arson, sedition and assault. Since nothing else has ‘stuck’ what would you recommend ?

I know it's dangerous to attempt to speak for others, but I believe dsrtsage's point was this: Compared to the seriousness of the act (attempting to blind police officers), the charge of civil disorder is woefully inadequate - the equivalent of jaywalking.

To quote PubliusMM (in post #28), "The charge should be felonious assault with intent to inflict grievous bodily injury." Something like that sounds reasonable to me.

I will note that it sounds like this might have been an additional arrest to add further charges (or maybe to add federal charges on to current local charges.) It sounds like he/she/it was initially arrested on Aug 8, and then arrested again on Sep 2, all from the same incident.

52 posted on 09/04/2020 8:46:25 AM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson