Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

As I understand you reasoning, man did not have pottery till 5000 years ago.

Perhaps that is the source of your error.


5 posted on 08/27/2020 9:21:29 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator

Well, traditionally, the earliest evidence for pottery is from Ubaid Mesopotamia, about 5000 years ago.

Yes, there have been more recent claims to date other finds earlier than that by carbon dating, but I don’t believe the totality of the evidence actually supports an earlier dating.

For example, carbon dating of pottery fragments from Japan may say “15000” years old but we know the Japanese culture was backwards compared to the Chinese until very recently, so it’s simply preposterous to think that:

a) this backwards culture independently invented pottery before their more advanced, literate neighbors

and

b) this backwards culture invented pottery and somehow it wasn’t transmitted to China despite constant contact between the two cultures.

That doesn’t make any sense. Therefore, the more likely explanation is that the carbon dating is wrong.


6 posted on 08/27/2020 9:59:44 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson