Replies

Posts above have a faithful recapitulation, I think. I was in the middle of listening to teevee, seeing QANON in the lower third, letting dogs out, and listening to better half.

WH will have a highly reliable transcript by tomorrow, but I’m sure other reliable sources (replay of presser ) will be online in short order.

If there is a disavowel in there, it is half-baked ;-)

If there is a disavowel in there, it is half-baked ;-)

I just returned from a dangerous undercover mission beyond the trees. I wonder, if President Trump can talk about Q on national television, can we talk about it on Free Republic?

Just wondering.

Two people I saw calling the end of Q per Trump. And trusty old Romanesq led the charge. He's always trying to put a round peg in a square whole, and he doesn't disappoint.

I'll post my thoughts that I put on that thread so I don't have to type them out again.

Bagster's take on Trumps Qanon comments.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3875837/posts?page=116#116

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3875837/posts?page=114#114

I had a few more tidbits to say, but the gist is, if our President wanted to debunk Q, he would have. He didn't.

There was almost radio silence on the Q topic. I felt a mood shift. The more Q is mainstreamed, the more FReepers seem to be at least thinking about it.

Professionals like Romanesq seem like the lone voice in the wilderness.

The winds are shifting, my fellows.

And winter is coming.

(here's the video again)

https://t.co/moyJnTWZsj— Bagster (@Bagster188) August 19, 2020