[Wuli]

They give QAnon too much credit.

They’re innuendo is that if QAnon supported anti-masking, that Qnon and QAnon followers alone were the largest influence in anti-masking.

That innuendo and its assumptions are just stupid.

There are tons of sources with no connections to QAnon that question the value of masking, and no none needs to be a QAnon follower to have discovered them.

[Cboldt]

The article is typical meandering rhetoric with who knows what aims, other than be critical of anti-mask, and critical of Qanaon, and hope to draw reader into concluding one is the cuase of the other, or that the populations overlap, or something.

I think it’s purposely disjointed. Readers will take away whatever their bias is.

[bagster]

There are tons of sources with no connections to QAnon that question the value of masking, and no none needs to be a QAnon follower to have discovered them.

Truth.

While Qanon says of the rona hoax, that ITS NOT ABOUT HEALTH. ITS ABOUT POLICICS, so called anti-masking is a movement independent of Q. Its more a product of liberty loving Americans who won't be fooled again.

Though people being awakened to the all pervasive government lying who weren't previously so are more susceptible to seeing deep state lies and manipulation.

We definitely can thank President Trump's Q program for that.

[The Truth Will Make You Free]

They have actually increased Q’s credibility. 1) It’s clear that Q and Qanon followers were not the only or main source of anti-mask-control. This discredits their headline. 2) If this is the best they have, then everything else Q must be OK.

The purpose of this lying manipulation is to keep those they control from Q posts such as “The war is real. The news is fake.”