Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
The higher the tariffs, the better the northeast manufacturers did while the worse the south did. Why?

Comment 54 in the thread said 75% of the tariffs were paid by the south. Without trying to confirm it, I assumed that was correct.

The quote you provided, talking about what the situation HAD been over the previous 70 years, ignores that the times had changed from the beginning of that time to the end. From 1844 to 1860, seven states were added to the union. MI, WI, MN, FL, TX, CA, and OR. Areas of the country where slavery was considered vital to the economy had reached it's natural limits, while the remainder of the country continued to expand. I believe that politics forced compromises in the 20 years prior to the war to appease the south, with the intention of holding the union together, but the trend pointed to an inevitable conclusion.

238 posted on 08/13/2020 7:34:20 AM PDT by Wissa ("Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]


To: Wissa
Comment 54 in the thread said 75% of the tariffs were paid by the south. Without trying to confirm it, I assumed that was correct.

And yet upwards of 95% of all tariff revenue was collected in Northern ports - specifically New York, Boston, and Philadelphia - as government documents for the year just prior to the rebellion show. How do you explain that? And if you do assume the South paid 75% of the tariff then what were they importing in such massive amounts?

245 posted on 08/13/2020 7:53:16 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson