Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank

As reported in July 2020, The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS, which runs the zoo) said:

“We deeply regret that many people and generations have been hurt by these actions or by our failure previously to publicly condemn and denounce them,” WCS President and CEO Cristián Samper wrote.

“We recognize that overt and systemic racism persists, and our institution must play a greater role to confront it.”

But was it really racism?

...

The apology misses the mark, completely.

As part of its mission to be more transparent, WCS is making all records and archives related to Benga publicly available.

While being politically correct and being swept up in a cultural tide, they are actually failing to be transparent. Although the zoo apologized for this racist action, nowhere in the zoo’s apologies or statements do they mention the real reason Ota Benga was put on display.

It was a belief in evolution, as clearly stated by the main players of the day themselves.

All five owners associated with Ota Benga—Samuel Verner, William McGee, William Hornaday, Henry Osborn, and Madison Grant—were well-known evolutionists of their day.”


2 posted on 08/11/2020 11:14:58 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fishtank

From article:

“But was it really racism?

...

It was a belief in evolution, as clearly stated by the main players of the day themselves.”


3 posted on 08/11/2020 11:15:32 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson