US vs Wong Kim Ark (1898) ruling by SCOTUS says that she is a natural born citizen.
The US Supreme Court ruling that “a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China”, automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth
A Citizen at Birth is a subset of all Citizens. And a “natural born Citizen” is a subset of all Citizens at Birth.
See the Euler Diagram link that follows below. Citizen at Birth under naturalization law Section 1401 and the 14th Amendment are made Citizens of the United States, not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. The adjectives “natural born” do not appear in the 14th Amendment or Section 1401 of the naturalization law. Adjectives mean something. Natural refers to “natural law” not man-made laws or amendments or treaties. Of tree and plants — all trees are plants but not all plants are tree. See this Euler Diagram to prove the truth or fallacy of the argument regarding the various sets/kinds of citizens and further education: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/tag/euler-diagram/
Not true.
Wong was just a citizen