[bitt]

look what wiki has for kamel:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris

.....In October 2003, the San Francisco Ethics Commission found that Harris unintentionally[36] violated the city’s campaign finance law by exceeding the voluntary $211,000 spending limit. In what was thought to be the largest fine to date under that law, the Ethics Commission levied up to $34,000 in penalties and corrective measures, and ordered her to buy newspaper ads informing voters about not abiding by the spending cap. Harris accepted full blame, saying, “Leadership isn’t about being perfect. Leadership means taking responsibility.”[36] Harris spent nearly $625,000 while Hallinan spent just over $285,000; both advanced to the general election runoff with 33% and 37% of the vote, respectively.[37]....

[bigbob]

Well, it was unintentional...why do you think the people who make the laws make it impossible for anything really bad to happen to THEM as a result of breaking the law?

“It’s a crooked system”

Now this:

Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
“DEVELOPING: Buzz inside Beltway is, Kamala Harris was not Biden’s 1st choice but was only seasoned pol willing to take job of doubling as an “essential worker” to nurse Biden through 3 mos of “in-home care.” Explains why Biden couldn’t recruit a superstar who wd energize the tix”

I’ve wondered how many were offered the job but turned it down...?