Thanks for the info. And now a few questions. If you’re a platform, are you saying that you cannot control content on your own site (except for explicitly illegal things)?
And what happens if you tried? Would that make you a publisher?
Would you believe the raw text of Section 230 is on p.3 of a Bing search? The first two pages are articles ‘explaining’ what one ought to think about it. P.1 on DuckDuckGo, which is kinda the point of all this; even a simple search is skewed to produce results supporting the C-suite’s desired thoughts.
Here’s a link. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
another.
http://www.columbia.edu/~mr2651/ecommerce3/2nd/statutes/CommunicationsDecencyAct.pdf
Clearly, and in any article not published in the Age of Cancel, this section is intended to promote free discussion by inhibiting liability to services.
The abuse lies in that companies aligned with DNC and PRC to quash free speech have gone ahead to do so one-sidedly offering only the barest fig leaf of “otherwise objectionable” to ban anything not aligned with the wokest insanity.