Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

“Can someone please explain how any President could have this kind of authority, legitimately?”

“The petition requests that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) clarify that Section 230 does not permit social media companies that alter or editorialize users’ speech to escape civil liability.”

How Section 230 is interpreted by the Executive Branch, unless spelled out by Congress first, is under the President’s authority. But if the law already provides the direction in the text, then the President (and FCC) could not change the interpretation.

I think most laws are made deliberately vague to give administrators huge leeway in how they are enforced. And that IS a huge problem with how Congress does its job. But...if Congress did not spell it out, then a federal agency in the Executive Branch would have to do so.


21 posted on 07/29/2020 5:24:42 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

Good answer, Mr. Rogers.


66 posted on 07/30/2020 11:37:11 AM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson