[JMS]

CNN is also trying to get people to believe that he settled for $25K to go away and that it was a nuisance suit. I’m sure when the layoffs at these places start because they’re really getting hit in the pocket they’ll still be saying that they settled for only $25K

[gcparent]

Sure Lin Wood settled and got 33^ or 8k for his trouble. He makes 8k in one day.

[Texas Fossil]

They deserve whatever it costs them.

The are totally valueless, and totally evil.

And they are powerful.

You can serve a good master or a evil master. Not both.

The love of money is the root of all evil. Evil is what coordinates those who have no faith, values or principles.

[Stosh]

“CNN is also trying to get people to believe that he settled for $25K to go away and that it was a nuisance suit.”

I’m the most frugal human being I know, and I try to teach my kids responsibility and temperance in handling money, but if I was Nick Sandman’s dad, and if in fact they settled a $250 million dollar lawsuit for something in 7 figures or 8 figures, I’d ask my son “How’d you like to have a Maserati GranTurismo as your driving-to-school car?” - and I’d be sure to send a picture of him with it to those jagoffs at CNN.

[Richard Kimball]

CNN is also trying to get people to believe that he settled for $25K to go away and that it was a nuisance suit.

Yes, and Brian Stelter just cost them more with this retweet:

CNN wasn't supposed to say anything about the terms of the agreement. Stelter retweeting this, whether it's true or not, is clearly making a commentary on the terms. He should probably be fired within the next couple of days. Normally, an employee that makes that kind of unforced error loses his job. There's a possiblity CNN thought they could sneak it into the narrative without claiming ownership by making it a retweet, but it's pretty stupid to do it through an employee rather than just having some of their twitter bots get it to trend.