[2nd amendment mama]

That is a really ignorant idea. A President of the U. S. should not be using any media that he does not control to issue statements or opinions for general release to the public.

So, I guess you're saying that the President should just shut up since he doesn't control any media. Since all the media is against President Trump how, in "imardmd1's world", should he get his message out?

[imardmd1]

I'm saying that DJT has control of official media within which he can promote his plan exclusively, and I agree with that. I have agreed with the proper use and dosages of HCQ, Z-max, soluble zinc, and vitamin D since the very beginning. In fact, back in December before the emergence of this virus scare, I demanded and got my physician to prescribe a Zithromax course to kill a worsening upper respiratory infection that had cling to me for several weeks. I have been taking vitamin D(3) daily for a long time. Last week I had a molar extracted which required me to be tested for the virus. The result was negative. And I think this whole mask-and-distancing tomfoolery is nothing but a method to get citizens ignorant civics as well as virus transmission to be isolated, in fear of each other, and of the wrongly assumed power of government.

What I am NOT agreeing with is that other more civil medical experts have enough facts and exposure to disseminating them to win the day for proper treatment. PDJT cannot order people to take these medications, nor does he have legitimate authority to still those physicians and politicians holding an adversarial position. That will be the case as it always has benn, and will be while freedom of speech still exists. It is not clear to me that Twitter management has taken a totally adversarial position on the health/medication matter. What is apparent is that PJDT does not have to force Twitter to accommodate his style of influencing people without respecting their dislike of his blundering about.

To me, his effectiveness in subduing Obama's wreckage of the American Way has been despite his vulgar treatment of his adversaries, not because of it. I believe we could be in much better shape if he had taken a higher road of personal behavior. That is why many who do not see beyond it have taken the "never-trump" stance. I have NOT taken that adversarial position toward his leadership in trying times. But some of his personal behavior I have trouble accepting as being fit for a President.

In November I will vote for him, and will support his campaign to the best I can. The alternative is ominous.