Even if disrupting, truth and facts would quickly extinguish it. But the reason I’m asking is I can’t find what the plan is.
Assuming this is a legit question. Here's the plan:
Question everything you read. Don't just accept ANYTHING that ANYONE says, including Q or ME. Look at the Q posts. Figure out, to the best of your ability, what he's trying to say. Compare that to other available sources. Make up your own mind.
Most of us on this thread have seen enough confirmation that we believe Q is legitimate. We've looked at the sick things Hollywood sells. We've looked at the FBI listed pedo symbols and seen them being worn by famous people and embedded in their posts. So, when we see a Q post, we trust that he's not lying and try to figure out what he says, and how it applies to current events.
What you're doing is the equivalent of walking in halfway through Godfather II and saying, "Hey, tell me about that guy Al Pacino is playing." We're not going to distract ourselves by explaining the plot of Godfather I and the Corleone family history to you. We're going to watch the movie and let you have the early stuff to catch up.
Information is posted at the start of every Q thread. If you have a question about something like "Who is JA?" we'll tell you, Julian Assange, but we're not going to go over 4600 posts and three years of research so you can go, "OK, cool." It bogs down the threads, and in two days, someone else will show up and say, "Hey, what's this Q stuff all about?" That's why there are several links at the start of each thread.