To: where's_the_Outrage?
Whoever is with his daughter could be charged with statutory rape and if she’s able to consent she’s still under 18 and therefore could be charged with producing kiddie porn.
5 posted on
07/08/2020 11:00:14 PM PDT by
JMS
To: JMS
Whoever is with his daughter could be charged with statutory rape and if she’s able to consent she’s still under 18 and therefore could be charged with producing kiddie porn.
Yeah, ruin the life of her 17-year-old boyfriend. "No charges were filed." Does that tell you something?
7 posted on
07/08/2020 11:26:34 PM PDT by
Veggie Todd
(Voltaire: "Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool".)
To: JMS
Whoever is with his daughter could be charged with statutory rape and if she’s able to consent she’s still under 18 and therefore could be charged with producing kiddie porn. If the State really wanted to go high and right, they could charge the daughter with production of child pornography and the father with possession, if he's the legal owner of the smart phone that contained the photos.
The boyfriend is most likely off the hook though for statutory rape charges.
12 posted on
07/09/2020 12:12:00 AM PDT by
Drew68
To: JMS
Were you never young? Why ruin a guy’s life because he and his girlfriend were stupid?
22 posted on
07/09/2020 4:04:16 AM PDT by
trebb
(Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
To: JMS
Some states the age of consent is 16. But either way 16 or 17 they know what they are doing.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson