If the big bang is just a theory for the ‘creation’ of the universe....
Might as well theorize multiple universes coming out of the same theory. Nothing to lose. But, why stop at just one universe?
Essentially, ‘universe’ means ‘the totality of it all’...
Which then means that, however ‘universes’ were created out of the big bang, is all just ONE BIGGER UNIVERSE.
BTW, I don’t believe in the big bang theory. Something much more ‘logical’ created the WHOLE universe.
That’s the nature of astrophysics research. Most data is observational, there are few ‘controlled’ experiments, and so it’s really about coming up with a mathematical model/theory that explains what’s been observed, and that hasn’t been disproved by any experimental or observational data.
If you could propose a mathematical model in which the universe is made of conscious/sentient particles, and could explain all observed phenomena with this model - and blamed any phenomena that weren’t completely explained on the spontaneous unpredictable behavior of the ‘conscious particles’, your theory could be just as valid as any other - if it could not be observationally or mathematically disproved.
Excuse me but the First Chapter of Genesis is the description of The Big Bang. Our whole existence is linear. Everything we can conceive is from beginning to end. The Big Bang says nothing existed before it so how did our universe suddenly spring into being? That spark that caused The Big Bang was God.
Genesis 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
The Big Bang was the brightest flash of light that ever existed. You could say it was God like.
I dare you to tell me that Science could never prove the existence of God, because Science already did.