I just read the article and it was informative but one mistake the author made was distasteful - he put Donald Trump’s name in along with Clinton and Prince Andrew. So that tarnishes the author’s ability to be rational and think clearly. But otherwise decent article.
Agree, although when the truth comes out and it’s proven that Trump had very limited interaction with Epstein vs. Clinton who had very extensive involvement, multiple trips, etc, it will be helpful to the cause. Because the fact is, even thought Trump eventually disavowed and banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, there are lots of photos of Trump and Epstein, including some with Melania and Ghislaine, and unless it is clarified they will be able to lump them all together.