[little jeremiah]

There has never been a case of a foreigner fraudulently using a fake identity to ususrp the presidency. As there is no precedent for how to deal with such a situation, so there is no surprise that there may be no law dealing with such a unique situation. And this is the SCOTUS legal position on natural born citizen definition:

Minor vs Happersett

In 1875, Chief Justice Morisson Waite wrote the opinion of the court on a unanimous decision, containing the following definition:

...the court observed that “new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization” and that the Constitution “does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens.” Under the common law, according to the court, “it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

[bigbob]

The biggest failing of all was allowing a person to become a nominee for Potus without an absolutely rock-solid determination of birth status. It could not have reeked any more strongly of fabrication and cover-up yet because he fit the narrative, no rigorous vetting occurred and even if an ex post facto law were passed, it is impossible to undo what was done.