“We have an immune system that is a miracle like The Sistine Chapel. It withstands toxic, microbial inundation on a grand scale at all times, while operating a super-highway of adaptive life-sustaining genetic information, on cellular bridges, emitting telegrams of vital evolutionary code, slandered as “viruses” or “retroviruses.””
Oh, I see. So the author thinks viruses are not real? Or not dangerous?
Alright, I’ll give her views a fair hearing. AFTER she injects herself with a hypodermic needle full of HIV-tainted blood.
And smallpox, polio, pertussis, ebola, rabies, hantavirus, dengue, etc.
Good luck with that Sistine Chapel of an immune system. Enjoy your telegrams.
The argument was more about the complete lack of scientific standards regarding diagnosis. Given the ridiculous propaganda surrounding this “pandemic”, I believe it’s a worthwhile read. Whether you buy into the AIDS/HIV debate or not, the facts are pretty clear: the “science” of detection is arbitrary at best and absolutely fraudulent at worse. These methods were never intended to be used for diagnosis, and relying on them for policy is asinine.
People are far too impressed with experts, and few have any understanding of how complicated the real world is. Obviously some get mortally ill from this disease, but comorbidity and lack of specificity of symptoms makes diagnosis a crapshoot. Those who are hospitalized with lungs looking like concrete are obviously infected, but many people with (or even without) various symptoms are being included in the cases.
I am very much at risk, as is my mom, but it’s not worth destroying the country or world over this. Magical thinking is not a good substitute for policy, despite a twenty-foot veneer of Inconclusive “data.”