No, you constantly dodge the issue. If the property owner can't decide how his property is used who does?
Be clear. In this case who decides what behavior YouTube has to allow?
I do not dodge the issue. You keep substituting the wrong issue for the real issue.
I no longer give the slightest crap about big tech "property rights." So far as i'm concerned, they are a threat, and I welcome any and all methods of bringing them to destruction.
If we are going to be forced into communism, we might as well adopt this portion of communism right now. No property rights for massive communications companies. All communications companies are to be owned by the state, and therefore will not be permitted to censor speech.
You want communism? Not stopping big tech censorship is how we get communism.