Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

It’s well written and is a good defense of our nation and its heritage, but it seems weak on action. Summary...
1. Prosecute to the fullest extent the criminals violating federal laws, some of which include state monuments
2. Withhold “limited” federal funds from jurisdictions that let marxists and other criminals destroy our country

All of the violent anarchists who disrupted the 2016 Inauguration were let go. ALL of them. So I don’t hold a lot of hope for #1.

This administrations previous effort to deny funds to states that allow “sanctuary” failed when judges blocked it. I expect judges will do the same thing here, so I don’t hold a lot of hope for #2 either.

Perhaps this is so timid because it is an election year.


7 posted on 06/26/2020 7:20:40 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ProtectOurFreedom

Kinda like a new liberal gun law that criminals wont abide by so what good is it ?
None


11 posted on 06/27/2020 5:51:33 AM PDT by Bell Bouy II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson